Befriending The Boss's Kid
On the dangers of the left-liberal professional political class
-
In Sacramento there is a professional political class which profits from the status quo, earning sumptuous salaries and living comfortable lives off of the social conditions as they are today. City Manager Howard Chan quickly comes to mind - and rightly so - however our current target is an apparatus secondary to the State itself. Some call it the Nonprofit Industrial Complex, others refer to it as controlled opposition, but for this piece we will refer to it as the left-liberal professional political class (LLPPC).
The LLPPC consists of nonprofit organizations, businesses, and moneyed individuals which work independently and in collaboration with each other and the State to affect (or recuperate) progressive social change. The LLPPC is for the most part primarily concerned with acquiring and sustaining revenue streams, even to the seeming detriment of their individual mission statements. This often manifests as a prioritization of data gathering, redundant meetings, and fundraising. In the extreme we see things like inflated government contracts coupled with gross negligence, such as the $3.2 million annual cost of the Miller Park Safe Ground campsite in Sacramento; or the widespread allegations of fiscal impropriety of the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation.
Squandered opportunities and resources are not the only harmful functions of the LLPPC - counter-organizing against movements, groups, and individuals that may threaten real social change is also endemic. That is why there is never a short supply of nonprofit organizations or milquetoast community leaders on hand to denounce or co-opt mass action to the benefit of the State. The outside agitator myth, condemnation of property damage as violence, and yellow-vest peace-police are some of the most well known tools of the LLPPC in this regard. More extreme tactics may mirror state repression more specifically, such as disinformation whisper campaigns, coordinated harassment, and the weaponization of monetary or material resources.
So what does all of this mean for nascent grassroots movements and those of us already years deep in community work? We must remain cognizant that organization from below will not be nurtured from above, and that philanthropy is merely a tool of the rich to garner themselves tax write-offs and social capital rather than a viable means to liberation. We must also remain wary of paid organizers, lobbyists, and businesspeople in general. When someone is earning a salary or otherwise profiting by ostensibly doing the same work that you are facing State repression for doing yourself - your interests cannot align in a meaningful way and they are likely in opposition.
In short we must seek to foster authentic grassroots movements among the most vulnerable, accepting that our resource limitations are indicative of our very position and cause. In a settler-colonial capitalist society there is no privilege that exists without strings, no matter the smiling face.