@RubberDuck@lemmy.world
0 Followers
0 Following
2 Posts

Climate plan based on phasing out fossil fuels doomed to fail, says Tony Blair

https://lemmy.world/post/28882044

Climate plan based on phasing out fossil fuels doomed to fail, says Tony Blair - Lemmy.World

Tony Blair has called for the government to change course on climate, suggesting a strategy that limits fossil fuels in the short term or encourages people to limit consumption is “doomed to fail”. In comments that have prompted a backlash within Labour, the former prime minister suggested the UK government should focus less on renewables and more on technological solutions such as carbon capture. Blair said people were “being asked to make financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle when they know that their impact on global emissions is minimal”. He said “any strategy based on either ‘phasing out’ fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail”. Writing the foreword for a report from the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), he said the current climate debate was “riven with irrationality” and suggested net zero was losing public support. His comments echo similar criticism of net zero by the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch. The paper itself, written by the TBI’s Lindy Fursman, said net zero policies were now “increasingly viewed as unaffordable, ineffective or politically toxic”. In the UK, however, climate change policies have retained popularity. The thinktank Persuasion UK said in a report published on Monday that Labour could lose far more seats at the next election from disillusioned leftwing voters defecting to the Greens than from defections to Reform. The most recent YouGov poll on the subject found 66% of UK voters were worried about climate change. Last week Keir Starmer said the government was going “all-out” for a low-carbon future, telling a conference in London that tackling the climate crisis and bolstering energy security were “in the DNA of my government” and that “we won’t wait – we will accelerate”. But Blair said present policy solutions were inadequate and leaders should shift towards a “pragmatic policy” that prioritised technological solutions. He said this was borne out by rising demand for production of fossil fuels, especially in China and India, the doubling of airline travel and increased demand for steel and cement. He said he still believed the climate was “one of the fundamental challenges of our time” and that renewable energy was necessary. But he said the government needed “to alter where we put our focus”. Fossil fuels are the largest contributor to the climate crisis, accounting for more than 75% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Blair said there was disdain for policies such as carbon capture in favour of renewables, which he said should be reversed, though the UK government has already made some significant commitments on carbon capture. He called for an international embrace of nuclear power and more work on new small modular reactors. One Labour MP said it was an unhelpful intervention that could be interpreted as a direct critique of Starmer and his energy secretary, Ed Miliband. “We know that businesses see renewables as a key path to economic growth, and it’s not like the government aren’t already doing things like carbon capture. I don’t get the point of pushing something like this – and the unpopularity of net zero is just plain wrong,” they said. An industry source said: “I don’t think the sector has any need for a tech-optimist vision of climate action that doesn’t represent the fantastic work the industry is doing today to both decarbonise and roll out clean energy at an unprecedented scale and it seems bizarre that the TBI report doesn’t recognise that.” The TBI, which has been highly influential in Labour circles, had welcomed action on renewables as recently as February when the seventh carbon budget was published. In a statement published at the time, Fursman said the programme was “rightly ambitious. In order to achieve it, cleaner options like heat pumps and EVs [electric vehicles] must be affordable and accessible”. Campaigners and industry figures said there were flaws in the TBI argument. Holly Brazier Tope, the deputy director of politics at Green Alliance, said: “This report is disappointing given Tony Blair’s strong track record on climate action, seeming to throw in the towel on avoiding the worst climate impacts and promoting defeatism instead of real solutions. It also wildly exaggerates the public backlash, especially in the UK where support for climate action remains solid.” Adam Berman, the director of policy and advocacy at Energy UK, said: “Net zero is the economic opportunity of the 21st century. Through the rapid uptake in technologies like wind and solar, UK emissions have halved since 1990. It’s not a question of either or; the UK will need both conventional clean technologies that are operating at scale today in addition to investments in newer technologies.”

Trump ‘makes trade deal with UK second-order priority’ in blow to ministers

https://lemmy.world/post/28881925

Trump ‘makes trade deal with UK second-order priority’ in blow to ministers - Lemmy.World

Donald Trump has made a trade deal with the UK a second-order priority, sources have told the Guardian, hampering British attempts to meet their mid-May deadline. US officials have decided to split their negotiations with more than a dozen other countries into three phases, with the UK being placed in either phase two or three, according to people who have been briefed on the talks. A trade deal with the US would be the biggest prize for British negotiators, who made major strides toward separate agreements with the EU and India on Tuesday. But UK officials fear that a deal with the EU, which they hope to agree at a summit on 19 May, could make it more difficult to negotiate with a Trump administration that repeatedly criticises European trade policies. One person with knowledge of the US talks said: “The US has now decided to negotiate its trade deals in three phases. The government has been told it will not be in phase one – though that leaves the door open to be in either phase two or three.” A spokesperson for the business department said: “The US is an indispensable ally and negotiations on an economic prosperity deal that strengthens our existing trading relationship continue. “We’ve been clear that a trade war is not in anyone’s interests and we will continue to take a calm and steady approach to talks.” The White House did not respond to a request to comment. British officials first presented a draft deal to their US counterparts weeks ago, before the president’s major tariff announcement. They hoped to agree a deal in time to grant the UK an exemption but, when that failed, shifted their focus instead to a self-imposed deadline of 19 May. Whitehall sources say, however, that negotiations have continued to be unpredictable in the weeks since Trump made his announcement. US officials are now reportedly demanding the UK lower its food quality standards to allow imports of American beef and chicken – something the Labour government has long ruled out. The draft agreement prepared by the British side would lead to the UK reducing its digital services tax, which is paid only by major US technology companies, in return for lower tariffs on steel, aluminium and cars. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, has also held out the possibility of reducing the 10% tariffs on US cars as an additional sweetener. But in the past few days the Trump administration has decided to split its negotiations with 17 different countries into three groups, each of which will get a week to negotiate in turn – a development first reported by the Wall Street Journal. The US has imposed a deadline of 8 July for talks to conclude – several weeks later than the UK target. Sources said UK officials had been told the immediate priority would be negotiating with Asian countries, with South Korea at the top of the list. Scott Bessent, the US Treasury secretary, told reporters on Tuesday that Asian trading partners such as India, South Korea and Japan “have been the most forthcoming, in terms of doing the deals”. He also criticised European countries for imposing digital services taxes on US companies, saying he wanted them to be removed. The British government has offered to reduce the tax but not to drop it entirely. Despite the new negotiating approach from the Trump administration, British negotiators are hopeful they will be able to continue talks – even if in a more unofficial capacity – throughout the next few weeks. One government source described the US tactics as “makeshift and unpredictable”. Another said contact had continued in the past few days despite the promised phasing of talks. However, the UK is making better headway with India and the EU. Negotiators held crunch talks on Tuesday afternoon with their Indian counterparts, after Piyush Goyal, India’s trade minister, told businesses at a roundtable in London that 25 out of 26 aspects of the deal had been agreed. UK officials were hopeful of finalising the deal on Tuesday, but one source briefed on the talks said they broke up without agreement on national insurance contributions. A longstanding sticking point has been Delhi’s concern that Indians working temporarily in the UK on business visas must pay national insurance despite not being eligible for UK pensions or social security benefits. The expectation is that at least one more round of talks will be needed to clinch any deal. Officials are in discussions over a potential visit by Keir Starmer to India this year once an agreement has been finalised. Meanwhile, British ministers including Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Cabinet Office minister, and Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, met Maroš Šefčovič, the EU trade commissioner, amid signs that a UK-EU deal could be getting closer. Šefčovič tweeted afterwards it had been “a productive exchange on securing balanced trade relationships, as we face new global dynamics”. The Guardian revealed last week that Brussels was willing to make major concessions to its proposals for a youth mobility scheme to get a deal over the line, including limiting work visas to 12 months, restricting the sectors EU citizens can work in. However, experts say that the plans to align British agricultural standards with European ones would make it impossible to give concessions on US demands to align with US ones instead. Anand Menon, the director of the thinktank UK in a Changing Europe, told MPs on Tuesday: “If the Americans say you have to lift the regulations that restrict the access of our goods to your market, that is incompatible with what we need to do to sign a … deal with the EU.”

Police and prosecutors’ details shared with Israel during UK protests inquiry, papers suggest

https://lemmy.world/post/28854298

Police and prosecutors’ details shared with Israel during UK protests inquiry, papers suggest - Lemmy.World

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28854294 [https://lemmy.world/post/28854294] > The UK government shared contact details of counter-terrorism police and prosecutors with the Israeli embassy during an investigation into protests at an arms factory, official documents suggest, raising concerns about foreign interference. > > An email was sent on 9 September last year by the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) to Daniela Grudsky Ekstein, Israel’s deputy ambassador to the UK, with the subject matter “CPS/SO15 [Crown Prosecution Service/counterterrorism police] contact details”. > > Last August, 10 Palestine Action activists were arrested under the Terrorism Act after a protest at an Israeli weapons factory, and in November a further eight were arrested under the act in relation to the same incident. The email sent by Nicola Smith, the head of international law at the AGO, and obtained through a freedom of information (FoI) request, was sent 11 days after she had met Grudsky Ekstein. It was redacted apart from the subject matter. > > Lydia Dagostino, from Kellys Solicitors, who represents some Palestine Action activists, said: “The information disclosed in response to an FoI request clearly raises questions and needs further investigation. > > “Why, for example, did the Attorney General’s Office provide the contact details for the Crown Prosecution Service, an independent body, to the Israelis? What further exchanges followed and was there discussions about ongoing criminal prosecutions? ” > > Dr Shahd Hammouri , an academic and international lawyer, also raised concerns about evidence “which indicates foreign influence”. > > A readout of what was discussed at the 28 August meeting between Smith and Grudsky Ekstein was heavily redacted. However, past disclosures have shown apparent requests by the Israeli embassy to the AGO to intervene in individual cases – unspecified due to redactions – and meetings held between the Israeli defence contractor’s representatives and the AGO and Home Office ministers. > > In 2023, the Guardian revealed that in response to a redacted request from the Israeli embassy, the director general of the AGO, Douglas Wilson, replied: “As we noted … the CPS makes its prosecution decisions and manages its casework independently. The law officers are unable to intervene on an individual case or comment on issues related to active proceedings.” > > Wilson was also present at the meeting in August last year with Smith and Grudsky Ekstein. > > A 2023 briefing note for a meeting between Chris Philp, then a Home Office minister, and the Israeli embassy said the CPS declined to attend the meeting “to preserve their operational independence”. > > Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, said: “The timing of this correspondence coincides with the ongoing investigation into Palestine Action activists accused of dismantling the […] site of Israel’s biggest arms producer. > > “It seems apparent that the Attorney General’s Office has facilitated foreign interference in this case and potentially other ongoing criminal cases.” > > In November last year, four UN special rapporteurs wrote to the UK government expressing concern about the “apparently unjustified use” of terrorism legislation against protesters. People arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 can he held for up to 14 days without charge. > > The letter from the human rights experts said those arrested in August were initially held for 36 hours, without access to legal representation, before being detained for a further seven days under powers contained in counter-terrorism legislation. > > The letter said: “Counterterrorism legislation, including the Terrorism Act 2000 and the Terrorism Act 2006, appears to have been increasingly used in the context of domestic support for Palestinian self-determination and political activism against the United Kingdom’s foreign policy on the conflict in the occupied Palestinian territory of Gaza. > > “In particular, members of Palestine Action – a grassroots movement that organises direct actions against Israeli weapons factories in the United Kingdom – have reportedly been arrested under counter-terrorism legislation for conduct that appears to be in the nature of ordinary criminal offences and does not appear to be genuinely ‘terrorist’ according to international standards.” > > No one was charged with offences under the Terrorism Act in relation to the protest. The 10 people charged with non-terrorism offences have had their legal support, family visits, healthcare and religious rights limited while in prison awaiting trial, according to the special rapporteurs’ letter. > > A government source said: “It has been routine under successive governments for AGO to help embassies get in contact with the relevant authorities purely for purposes of sharing information that could be relevant to a case. > > “Decisions to prosecute, convict and sentence are, rightly, made independently of government by the Crown Prosecution Service, juries and judges respectively.” > > The Israeli embassy did not respond to a request for comment. Relating to a separate case, an Israeli embassy spokesperson previously said it respected the independence of the British judicial system and “under no circumstances would interfere in UK legal proceedings”. > >

Police and prosecutors’ details shared with Israel during UK protests inquiry, papers suggest

https://lemmy.world/post/28854297

Police and prosecutors’ details shared with Israel during UK protests inquiry, papers suggest - Lemmy.World

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28854294 [https://lemmy.world/post/28854294] > The UK government shared contact details of counter-terrorism police and prosecutors with the Israeli embassy during an investigation into protests at an arms factory, official documents suggest, raising concerns about foreign interference. > > An email was sent on 9 September last year by the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) to Daniela Grudsky Ekstein, Israel’s deputy ambassador to the UK, with the subject matter “CPS/SO15 [Crown Prosecution Service/counterterrorism police] contact details”. > > Last August, 10 Palestine Action activists were arrested under the Terrorism Act after a protest at an Israeli weapons factory, and in November a further eight were arrested under the act in relation to the same incident. The email sent by Nicola Smith, the head of international law at the AGO, and obtained through a freedom of information (FoI) request, was sent 11 days after she had met Grudsky Ekstein. It was redacted apart from the subject matter. > > Lydia Dagostino, from Kellys Solicitors, who represents some Palestine Action activists, said: “The information disclosed in response to an FoI request clearly raises questions and needs further investigation. > > “Why, for example, did the Attorney General’s Office provide the contact details for the Crown Prosecution Service, an independent body, to the Israelis? What further exchanges followed and was there discussions about ongoing criminal prosecutions? ” > > Dr Shahd Hammouri , an academic and international lawyer, also raised concerns about evidence “which indicates foreign influence”. > > A readout of what was discussed at the 28 August meeting between Smith and Grudsky Ekstein was heavily redacted. However, past disclosures have shown apparent requests by the Israeli embassy to the AGO to intervene in individual cases – unspecified due to redactions – and meetings held between the Israeli defence contractor’s representatives and the AGO and Home Office ministers. > > In 2023, the Guardian revealed that in response to a redacted request from the Israeli embassy, the director general of the AGO, Douglas Wilson, replied: “As we noted … the CPS makes its prosecution decisions and manages its casework independently. The law officers are unable to intervene on an individual case or comment on issues related to active proceedings.” > > Wilson was also present at the meeting in August last year with Smith and Grudsky Ekstein. > > A 2023 briefing note for a meeting between Chris Philp, then a Home Office minister, and the Israeli embassy said the CPS declined to attend the meeting “to preserve their operational independence”. > > Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, said: “The timing of this correspondence coincides with the ongoing investigation into Palestine Action activists accused of dismantling the […] site of Israel’s biggest arms producer. > > “It seems apparent that the Attorney General’s Office has facilitated foreign interference in this case and potentially other ongoing criminal cases.” > > In November last year, four UN special rapporteurs wrote to the UK government expressing concern about the “apparently unjustified use” of terrorism legislation against protesters. People arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 can he held for up to 14 days without charge. > > The letter from the human rights experts said those arrested in August were initially held for 36 hours, without access to legal representation, before being detained for a further seven days under powers contained in counter-terrorism legislation. > > The letter said: “Counterterrorism legislation, including the Terrorism Act 2000 and the Terrorism Act 2006, appears to have been increasingly used in the context of domestic support for Palestinian self-determination and political activism against the United Kingdom’s foreign policy on the conflict in the occupied Palestinian territory of Gaza. > > “In particular, members of Palestine Action – a grassroots movement that organises direct actions against Israeli weapons factories in the United Kingdom – have reportedly been arrested under counter-terrorism legislation for conduct that appears to be in the nature of ordinary criminal offences and does not appear to be genuinely ‘terrorist’ according to international standards.” > > No one was charged with offences under the Terrorism Act in relation to the protest. The 10 people charged with non-terrorism offences have had their legal support, family visits, healthcare and religious rights limited while in prison awaiting trial, according to the special rapporteurs’ letter. > > A government source said: “It has been routine under successive governments for AGO to help embassies get in contact with the relevant authorities purely for purposes of sharing information that could be relevant to a case. > > “Decisions to prosecute, convict and sentence are, rightly, made independently of government by the Crown Prosecution Service, juries and judges respectively.” > > The Israeli embassy did not respond to a request for comment. Relating to a separate case, an Israeli embassy spokesperson previously said it respected the independence of the British judicial system and “under no circumstances would interfere in UK legal proceedings”. > >

Police and prosecutors’ details shared with Israel during UK protests inquiry, papers suggest

https://lemmy.world/post/28854294

Police and prosecutors’ details shared with Israel during UK protests inquiry, papers suggest - Lemmy.World

The UK government shared contact details of counter-terrorism police and prosecutors with the Israeli embassy during an investigation into protests at an arms factory, official documents suggest, raising concerns about foreign interference. An email was sent on 9 September last year by the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) to Daniela Grudsky Ekstein, Israel’s deputy ambassador to the UK, with the subject matter “CPS/SO15 [Crown Prosecution Service/counterterrorism police] contact details”. Last August, 10 Palestine Action activists were arrested under the Terrorism Act after a protest at an Israeli weapons factory, and in November a further eight were arrested under the act in relation to the same incident. The email sent by Nicola Smith, the head of international law at the AGO, and obtained through a freedom of information (FoI) request, was sent 11 days after she had met Grudsky Ekstein. It was redacted apart from the subject matter. Lydia Dagostino, from Kellys Solicitors, who represents some Palestine Action activists, said: “The information disclosed in response to an FoI request clearly raises questions and needs further investigation. “Why, for example, did the Attorney General’s Office provide the contact details for the Crown Prosecution Service, an independent body, to the Israelis? What further exchanges followed and was there discussions about ongoing criminal prosecutions? ” Dr Shahd Hammouri , an academic and international lawyer, also raised concerns about evidence “which indicates foreign influence”. A readout of what was discussed at the 28 August meeting between Smith and Grudsky Ekstein was heavily redacted. However, past disclosures have shown apparent requests by the Israeli embassy to the AGO to intervene in individual cases – unspecified due to redactions – and meetings held between the Israeli defence contractor’s representatives and the AGO and Home Office ministers. In 2023, the Guardian revealed that in response to a redacted request from the Israeli embassy, the director general of the AGO, Douglas Wilson, replied: “As we noted … the CPS makes its prosecution decisions and manages its casework independently. The law officers are unable to intervene on an individual case or comment on issues related to active proceedings.” Wilson was also present at the meeting in August last year with Smith and Grudsky Ekstein. A 2023 briefing note for a meeting between Chris Philp, then a Home Office minister, and the Israeli embassy said the CPS declined to attend the meeting “to preserve their operational independence”. Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, said: “The timing of this correspondence coincides with the ongoing investigation into Palestine Action activists accused of dismantling the […] site of Israel’s biggest arms producer. “It seems apparent that the Attorney General’s Office has facilitated foreign interference in this case and potentially other ongoing criminal cases.” In November last year, four UN special rapporteurs wrote to the UK government expressing concern about the “apparently unjustified use” of terrorism legislation against protesters. People arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 can he held for up to 14 days without charge. The letter from the human rights experts said those arrested in August were initially held for 36 hours, without access to legal representation, before being detained for a further seven days under powers contained in counter-terrorism legislation. The letter said: “Counterterrorism legislation, including the Terrorism Act 2000 and the Terrorism Act 2006, appears to have been increasingly used in the context of domestic support for Palestinian self-determination and political activism against the United Kingdom’s foreign policy on the conflict in the occupied Palestinian territory of Gaza. “In particular, members of Palestine Action – a grassroots movement that organises direct actions against Israeli weapons factories in the United Kingdom – have reportedly been arrested under counter-terrorism legislation for conduct that appears to be in the nature of ordinary criminal offences and does not appear to be genuinely ‘terrorist’ according to international standards.” No one was charged with offences under the Terrorism Act in relation to the protest. The 10 people charged with non-terrorism offences have had their legal support, family visits, healthcare and religious rights limited while in prison awaiting trial, according to the special rapporteurs’ letter. A government source said: “It has been routine under successive governments for AGO to help embassies get in contact with the relevant authorities purely for purposes of sharing information that could be relevant to a case. “Decisions to prosecute, convict and sentence are, rightly, made independently of government by the Crown Prosecution Service, juries and judges respectively.” The Israeli embassy did not respond to a request for comment. Relating to a separate case, an Israeli embassy spokesperson previously said it respected the independence of the British judicial system and “under no circumstances would interfere in UK legal proceedings”.

Whitehall officials ‘pushing for the Open to return to Trump-owned Turnberry’

https://lemmy.world/post/28836489

Whitehall officials ‘pushing for the Open to return to Trump-owned Turnberry’ - Lemmy.World

Senior Whitehall officials have asked golf bosses whether they can host the 2028 Open championship at Donald Trump’s Turnberry course after repeated requests from the US president, sources have said. Officials had asked senior people at the R&A, which organises the world’s oldest major golf championship, what the hurdles would be to hosting the 2028 Open at Turnberry. One source described the talks as direct lobbying from the government, although others said officials had asked about hypothetical problems with the idea, rather than insisting that it happen. One person with knowledge of the discussions said: “The government is doing everything it can to get close to Trump. One concrete thing is that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) have been involved in pushing for the Open to return to Trump-owned Turnberry.” Both the DCMS and Trump Turnberry declined to comment. Two other people briefed on conversations between the US president and Keir Starmer said Trump had asked the prime minister multiple times about hosting the Open at Turnberry, which the Trump Organization has owned since 2014. Trump has previously lobbied publicly to host the Open at the Ayrshire course, saying in 2023: “Everybody wants to see the Open championship here.” King Charles acknowledged the course’s importance to Trump when he wrote to him offering a visit to one of his Scottish estates should the president already be in the country visiting Turnberry. Hosting the Open could provide a welcome financial boost for SLC Turnberry, the course’s operating company, which is run by the president’s sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. Last year the company lost £1.7m, having made £571,000 in the previous year – its only profit in 10 years. The R&A has a list of nine or 10 historic courses it would consider for hosting the Open, including famous venues such as St Andrews and Royal Birkdale. Turnberry is on that list, having hosted the championship in 2009. However golf experts point out that the event has grown substantially since then. While the 2009 Open attracted 123,000 people, the event at Royal Troon last year was attended by over 250,000. The R&A previously said it would not host the tournament at Turnberry in the wake of the January 6 attack by Trump supporters on the Capitol in 2021. Last November, the then head of the organisation, said he did not want “media noise” detracting from the game. Since then however the R&A has changed leadership. And in an apparent shift of position Mark Darbon, the new chief executive, said last week he would like to see the championship return to Turnberry “at some point”. Those briefed on the discussions between government officials and the R&A say they have mainly focused on the logistical challenges to hosting the Open at Turnberry. They said the main problems would be getting the sheer number of spectators in and out of the site by road, rail and air, given Turnberry is a two-and-a-half hour train trip from Glasgow, or a one-hour drive along a single A-road. Darbon said last week: “At Turnberry, there are definitely some logistical and commercial challenges that we face around the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure. We’re doing some feasibility work around what it would look like to return to that venue and the investment that it would require.” One minister told the Financial Times earlier this year the venue would need “tens, or hundreds, of millions of pounds of investment” to make it easier to reach and to provide enough high-quality hotel accommodation in the area. A spokesperson for R&A said: “We regularly engage with government and local government regarding venues. We have explained the logistical challenges around Turnberry to the government and they are aware of the position.

Gordon Brown makes criminal complaint against Rupert Murdoch’s media empire

https://lemmy.world/post/28748506

Gordon Brown makes criminal complaint against Rupert Murdoch’s media empire - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

‘One mistake and their Germanness is gone’: how idea of stripping citizenship for crimes spread across Europe

https://lemmy.world/post/28730133

‘One mistake and their Germanness is gone’: how idea of stripping citizenship for crimes spread across Europe - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

Starmer faces Labour revolt over plan to raid bank accounts of benefit claimants

https://lemmy.world/post/28693230

Starmer faces Labour revolt over plan to raid bank accounts of benefit claimants - Lemmy.World

Keir Starmer is facing a rebellion over his plan to use direct deductions from people’s bank accounts and the cancellation of driving licences as part of a government crackdown on welfare fraud and over-claiming. In an attempt to claw back the annual £9.7bn in benefit overpayments made by the Department for Work and Pensions due to fraud or error, the government has adopted Conservative plans for debt recovery. A fraud, error and recovery bill would give the DWP the power to require banks to provide data to help identify when an applicant is not meeting the eligibility criteria for a benefit for which they have applied. The bill would allow the government to demand bank statements to identify debtors who have sufficient funds to repay what they owe through fraud or error in a claim. The DWP would then have the power to recover money directly from bank accounts of those not on benefits or in PAYE employment who are identified as having the means to pay. Those who repeatedly fail to repay funds could fall prey to a suspended DWP disqualification order that would disqualify them from holding a driving licence. Liz Kendall, the secretary of state for work and pensions, has said the powers are necessary to deal with a “broken welfare system” but she is facing opposition from her own backbenches. Amendments tabled by the Labour MP for Poole, Neil Duncan-Jordan, that would force the government to drop key strands of the bill are supported by a growing number of MPs in Starmer’s party. The amendments, backed by 17 named Labour MPs, would ensure that only those suspected of fraud rather than being the victim of an error were subjected to surveillance, “allowing the government to target criminality without monitoring the public”, Duncan-Jordan said. The Labour MP is also proposing to remove the power to apply to a court to strip people of their driving licences due to debt, describing the policy as a “poverty penalty”. Writing in the Guardian, Duncan-Jordan, who was elected for the first time in 2024, accused Starmer’s government of “resurrecting Tory proposals for mass spying on people who receive state support”. He writes that the legislation “would compel banks to carry out financial surveillance of welfare recipients”, adding that “given the volume of accounts involved, this will be completed by an algorithm”. “If the software flags a possible overpayment, whether due to fraud or error, the bank will report the individual to the Department for Work and Pensions for further investigation”, Duncan-Jordan writes. “By default, welfare recipients would be treated as suspects, simply because they need support from the state.” He adds that the government should learn from the Post Office scandal in which a faulty computer system led to hundreds of people being falsely accused of fraud and error. He writes: “The risk of a Horizon-style scandal on a massive scale is glaringly obvious when millions are being monitored. It will be disabled people, carers, pensioners and the very poorest people who are impacted by wrongful investigations and forced to endure burdensome appeals to prove their innocence.” Kendall has said the use of “direct deduction orders” allowing the recovery of funds from claimants could save the taxpayer £500m a year once fully rolled out. In the 2023-24 financial year, the DWP estimates that benefit overpayments due to fraud or error by claimants totalled £9.7bn. But the banking industry has raised concerns that it will be forced to hand over account information of claimants in cases where there are indications they may have been paid benefits incorrectly. The legislation is seen to potentially clash with the obligations of banks under a Financial Conduct Authority consumer duty to protect customers who are vulnerable due to their financial situation. Last week, the Guardian revealed that the regulatory policy committee, a government watchdog, had raised concerns that ministers had understated the impact on the poorest of its plans to directly deduct benefit overpayments from people’s bank accounts. The DWP has been contacted for comment.

Wood-burning stoves to be allowed in new homes in England despite concerns

https://lemmy.world/post/28648073

Wood-burning stoves to be allowed in new homes in England despite concerns - Lemmy.World

Wood-burning stoves will be allowed to heat new-build homes in England despite growing evidence showing their significant contribution to air pollution and carbon emissions. The government is writing its future homes standard, a set of rules for developers, aimed at decarbonising England’s housing stock. Heating the UK’s 28m homes accounts for about 18% of greenhouse gas emissions. However, there are fears that after intense lobbying, these standards will be weakened. The Guardian recently reported that the Labour party is considering making solar panels optional on new homes in England after pressure from housebuilders. The Stove Industry Association (SIA) has released a letter it received from the government confirming the appliances will be allowed in new homes. It reads: “A full technical consultation on the future homes standard was launched in December 2023 and closed in March 2024. Under the standards proposed in the consultation, a wood-burning stove would be permitted as a secondary heating source in new homes.” The Climate Change Committee has recommended the phasing out of wood-burning stoves in homes because of the carbon they emit. They also produce dangerous PM2.5 particles that, according to a growing body of research, are responsible for a range of health problems including heart and lung disease, as well as diabetes, cancer, brain function and premature births. Last year, a study by Prof Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, found that even “eco-design” wood-burning stoves produced 450 times more toxic air pollution than gas central heating. Jemima Hartshorn, the co-founder of the Mums for Lungs campaign group, said: “This is a very disappointing and surprising decision by government. We know that wood burning is one of the major sources of toxic air pollution that is killing tens of thousands of people every year and is linked to a range of serious and life-changing diseases. “Due to the high amount of greenhouse gases emitted when burning wood and solid fuels, the Climate Change Committee strongly advises that it needs to be phased out as it is not carbon neutral and has no place in how homes should be heated in the 21st century.” Andy Hill, the chair of the SIA, said: “We are delighted that it has been officially confirmed that under the proposed future homes standard, the installation of a wood-burning stove will be permitted. “The SIA welcomes the government’s positive response and looks forward to continued engagement as policies are developed and implemented.”