~🇳🇴NOREG`S SONGEN🇳🇴~
[Mel. Trad.]
🎶
Tjoho for Noreg
det er ein heilt grei plass å bu
Hadde det ikkje vori for folka
herregud så mykje rart det er
Og mykje kan bli betre
Ærleg tala skjerp dykk
Men jau det er frykteleg pent her
det er jo det
Iallfall slik generelt
Nokre plassar er sjølvsagt heslege
Sætergrenda til dømes
Jaja men læll då gitt
🎶
Gratulerer med dagen, om de feirer med joggebukse og gaming eller bunad og leikarring (eller alt ihop)💖
@cstross Rules of the road quite clearly state that you must be able to stop in the length you can see *at any time*. If the car was going faster than sensor distance / breaking time, it was breaking the law.
And, fun fact, since it was obviously programmed to do that, it wasn't just breaking the law at the time it crossed the speed threshold, but from the very beginning.
An autonomous car that is even capable of hitting a stationary target is not street legal, by definition.
It's not an ethical dilemma. If a HUMAN driver got into a situation where they had to choose between hitting and killing a granny or baby, we'd rightly jail them for many years for reckless/dangerous driving.
A self-driving vehicle should be incapable of operating in a manner equivalent to a reckless human driver.
If a self-driving vehicle is capable of getting into such a situation, the car manufacturer is responsible for a crime of homicide and should be punished.
Attached: 1 image It's concerning to me that this """ethical dilemma""" comes up so frequently regarding self-driving cars. Does self-driving mean *never slows or stops*? Are self-driving cars all designed after the bus in Speed?