Get good needs a definition? Learn -> (hypothesize -> practice -> look at results/ask for feedback -> improve hypothesis), repeat?

I need everyone to look at what you can do with HTML5 “game engines”. You want mouse poisiton? You want to know if the mouse is in on the page or not? Internet speed? Audio card codec?

If a 13 years old using the free version of construct3 can do it, capitalism can do it.

Guys you heard it here first: You can drink alcohol for 16 hours everyday and it’s not addiction.

I still would never watch someone do sports but the other day I had this idea: Children sports must be more exciting to watch because children grow -> they have to adapt to their new arm length on the match day! Whoops his aim is off by 2 cm today, can he adapt in time??!

Why “can’t you”? Why would academic research be impossible?

Every person (who is not deemed invalid, criminals cannot vote haha what if they change the law right?) gets to vote + Everyone’s vote counts the same = If you have one child your family has 3 votes, if your neighbor has 4 children they have 7 votes. In a democratic event, if they can come to an agreement, they choose what happens without your input.

Maybe in the next generation your children will out-procreate their children, then you get to decide without your neighbor’s input. How isn’t it fuck-based?

This is a real problem though. Democracy is a fuck-based system. Uneducated people fuck without protection more ofthen than educated people, which gives them more voting power. Minorities are only protected if the big-fuckers want it, since by design majority wins.

I used to believe art could be used to gaze into the zeitgeist of their production times.

Then I realized what you have just said. If someone in the future looks at hollywood productions, they’ll have very wrong ideas about how people live nowadays. Like, it will be comically wrong. You could throw a dice to select a verb from a dictionary and you’d be more correct.

This is about steam. Post another thing for epic if you want. Whataboutism is not a good look. Two things can be bad at the same time. One thing can be “better” than something else while still being bad.

Sounds more plausible than some of the tech talking points.

They “just” need the expantional growth to be linear? If we can wish to change maths, we can change our own biology!