Osmo Patagium, Pointy Bat Pone

100 Followers
75 Following
996 Posts

Humble Leader of the county of Ponyvania (ponyvania.com), Deep in the Clopathian Mountains. It is a dark and mysterious place that sits at a crossroads of time, space and narrative. All are welcome.

Full disclosure. Follow me, and you'll see ponies, science, general nerdery, and prognostications on the coming automation economy.

@devopscats

…do you want some toast!

Making Minty an 80’s girl band member was honestly brilliant. I guess she traded in the socks for leg warmers. #mlp #mlpg5

24 degrees in my friend’s office yesterday. I bet you can’t guess…

1. The units

2. Who leads the entity she works for

Are you doing resolutions or themes this year, and what are they?

I hate to say it, but my theme is “deliver and get $$$,” because I need to do both a lot more frequently.

@xargos32 @Patagium

Wait. It’s been increasing since at least 2011 according to that plot. It’s the nature of cloud services companies to increase every year as people keep loading them up with more data, documents, and emails. If it’s increasing more _slowly_, that implies that AI is actually helping. If AI is the power sucker people claim, the increase should be higher than pre-2020, not lower.

@xargos32 Also. The year-on-year growth rate of Google’s energy consumption has been decreasing since 2018. There has been no sudden explosion in energy need. It’s actually slowing. Last year was the second lowest on record.

@xargos32

Less energy use is less energy use. IF you don’t like HOW the energy issuing used, that’s a you problem.

The only difference is that the energy used for AI can be counted because it’s on one meter. The 100-1000x energy that it’s saving is 1000’s of meters so you can pretend it doesn’t exist. It does. I know because I used to be turning one of those meters doing freelance writing.

@xargos32

Hmm. I’m usually 100% behind what NPR says but the science seems to say something else.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x

The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans - Scientific Reports

As AI systems proliferate, their greenhouse gas emissions are an increasingly important concern for human societies. In this article, we present a comparative analysis of the carbon emissions associated with AI systems (ChatGPT, BLOOM, DALL-E2, Midjourney) and human individuals performing equivalent writing and illustrating tasks. Our findings reveal that AI systems emit between 130 and 1500 times less CO2e per page of text generated compared to human writers, while AI illustration systems emit between 310 and 2900 times less CO2e per image than their human counterparts. Emissions analyses do not account for social impacts such as professional displacement, legality, and rebound effects. In addition, AI is not a substitute for all human tasks. Nevertheless, at present, the use of AI holds the potential to carry out several major activities at much lower emission levels than can humans.

Nature
Welp. I miscalculated the number of small pieces I need to print for the Christmas present I was planing. It’s not 128, but 256. I guess it’s going to be a Birthday present.
@quad Ah yes. The days when we’d clean our balls regularly. There was a kind of ASMR satisfaction from pulling the impacted lint out of those mice.