Does that help?

Yes, it helps a lot with understanding the “model”. Thanks!

Some of the ideas are so crazy that my brain did not allow some of these interpretations that you have explained now :)

Orange is a huuge disappointment.

the collector and the seller know

So you have never bought or inherited an old collection - large boxes rather than single books? “Going to sort them later…” :)

It is not only critique. There’s much more in it. For example, there are lots of suggestions how to do it better, in many different aspects. This thing hasn’t been written in an hour.

I would assume that every serious collector of books, everybody who has more than a few shelves full, has not read all of them.

Article 5 doesn’t actually oblige NATO members

I do not share your interpretation (although I know that it has been the popular one recently).

I read it like this:

The obligation is out of any question: they “will” assist.

The goal of all measures is defined: “restore […] peace and security”.

The choice of measures isn’t totally free. It must fit to that goal.

So, yes they can decide whether or not no use force, but they cannot follow random political agendas there.

And not fold paper airplanes instead of real ones :)

Greenland is not a nato member

That’s like saying your right arm isn’t a human.

Greenland is simply a part of Denmark, so it is a NATO member.

USA itself would violate it’s own membership. With such an act it became the enemy of the NATO.

Aber du kannst Whatboutismus doch nicht mit Reflexion bekämpfen! ;-)

Surely we would not have our bodies so full of microplastic if our stomachs could destroy them.