And yet… you still… never mind. Not worth it.

Ah, my kith and kin. Salutations, ye of excellent discerning taste.

One could say this Antifa guy has pretty good point!

An invertebrate only implies that there are no vertebrae, or “spine bones”, in the organism, not that the organism’s “bones are on the outside”.

You’re using a logical fallacy called reductio ad absurdum You take my interpretation of Linux’s definition to an extreme to make it look ridiculous.

​The core of your argument is: “If X is a collection of algorithms, and Y is also a collection of algorithms, then you’re saying X is Y.” Which, of course, isn’t what I said at all.

I’m not saying Linux is a video game; I’m saying they are both built from the same components: algorithms.

You’re talking about what it is (a System), and I’m talking about how it works (a massive orchestration of Algorithms).

The ​linux kernel is a modular library of mathematical logic (algorithms) that solves the specific problem of hardware abstraction. A web browser is a collection of algorithms that solves the problem of rendering the web. They are different ‘tools’ built from the same ‘logic bricks’.

To be fair to you and remain taxonomically accurate, the linux kernel is a system of algorithms, which (to be fair to me) can be considered an algorithm (the main loop) of algorithms.

K is potassium.

The linux kernel, given my very pedestrian understanding of it, is a program that allows other programs (e.g., GNU utilities) to talk to a computer system’s hardware.

Therefore, linux could be considered a collection of algorithms that can be modularly compiled to handle:

• Resource Alocation
• Memory Man I responded with what I just typed to someone who said Linux is not an algorithm. agement
• Abstraction

You forgot the -v tag to watch your dreams die in real time!

I suppose the Democrats could fillibuster and obstruct every vote possible.