Lieutenant Liana

0 Followers
0 Following
31 Posts

YSK: All social and cultural groups are diverse and hold people of many different views

https://startrek.website/post/3689353

YSK: All social and cultural groups are diverse and hold people of many different views - Star Trek: Website

No nation in the world is a mono-culture, and often times, people repeat statements they saw specific folk from other cultures make and assume they speak for their entire culture. This is called a faulty generalization [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulty_generalization], or over-generalization, and is a logical fallacy. Every culture has their majorities and minorities - just like neither Trump nor Biden speak for all Americans, the person who educates you about Native American, French, Russian, Indian or Ghanan culture might just happen to be someone with an ideology that their own countrymen would harshly disagree with. Many people repeat statements that single people on Reddit make such as “actually, we people in Central/South America think the word Latinx is ridiculous and don’t use it” completely uncritically, even though for this example, the word even originated within minority groups within those countries (although Latine is more widely accepted, on a tangent). Similarly, when I read communities dedicated to learning my native language, German, I find a lot of questions by learners that are like “are there non-binary pronouns in German?” or “how do I use gender-neutral language?” and all of the answers basically being “no, it’s ungrammatical, nobody uses those, you are ridiculing yourself, generic masculine is universally accepted”. As a German, this is just a conservative world view; admittedly, held by a majority, but nonetheless not universal across Germans. It’s a similar problem to the “n-word pass” - just because some Black person told you they’re not offended, it does not mean that other Black people agree with them or that they are even right. Just because some trans people tell you that they don’t believe in gender does not mean that gender abolitionism is a central tenet of “transgenderism”. Just because a bunch of Native Americans came together and say that “Redskins” is actually an inoffensive name that they’re proud of, does not mean they speak for all Native Americans and can be used as a token - or vice versa. Make sure that you always realize that all countries have progressives and conservatives, old and young people, people of fringe ideologies, queer people, people who disagree on social issues, and so on. Not all Muslims are homophobic or transphobic. Not all French people are stuck up about their language. Not all Americans are gun-toting rifle nuts; and even among those, not all of them are conservatives. The world is infinitely complex. Don’t give in to overgeneralization.

How are the CAT feature phones privacy-wise (Cat B40)?

https://startrek.website/post/2647226

How are the CAT feature phones privacy-wise (Cat B40)? - Star Trek: Website

Hey there, I am thinking about buying the Cat B40 feature phone. My gut feeling tells me that since it does not run either iOS or Android, is a relatively small company in the data/tech sector, and generally it’s literally just a feature phone with barely any… well, features, let alone any that would make my data valuable, it should not be profitable for anyone to harvest any data or spy on me. But I realize that’s prejudice and I have nothing to back that gut feeling up, and hell, they could still track my location or whatever. I can find no real information on which operating system runs on the thing, let alone what it can or cannot do software-wise. Does anyone have any information on that thing?

When will Memory Alpha/Beta move from Fandom to an indie wiki?

https://startrek.website/post/2262729

When will Memory Alpha/Beta move from Fandom to an indie wiki? - Star Trek: Website

Hey there, as many of you might know, there’s an ongoing mass community effort [https://gamingwikinetwork.org/] to move away from the free wiki hoster Fandom (what used to be wikia or gamepedia) to self-hosted wikis. It’s a similar campaign to the move to Lemmy, albeit much more successful. Fandom is a predatory marketing and ad company that uses auto-play videos, has banners obscuring the content to a ridiculous degree, does not respect the work the editors put into their wikis, and after all makes their own sites super slow to use from all the ads, with ads loading in just as you want to click on a link, making the entire layout move to make you click on the ad after all. They’re constantly trying to make the site into something of a “social media page” and are a prime example of so-called “enshittification”. Examples of these self-hosted anti-Fandom wiki efforts are the Baldur’s Gate 3 wiki [https://bg3.wiki/] and the Elder Scrolls Pages [https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Main_Page]. Even the Star Trek Online wiki [https://stowiki.net/] has moved from Fandom to their own self-hosted variant, although their slow server choice leaves some things to be desired, and of course this very instance (startrek.website [https://startrek.website]) also is a self-hosted indie initiative. Memory Alpha and Memory Beta stand out in the world as excellent wikis that categorize most details about one of the most extensive franchises ever. They really deserve a clean, ad-free, self-controlled experience. I wanted to contribute to them forever (adding to Memory Beta as I read novels), but the idea of supporting Fandom with an active account makes me uncomfortable. Does anyone know why they have not moved yet?

Neural Energy: The Science of Soul and Consciousness in Star Trek; and why we cannot replicate, but transport living beings

https://startrek.website/post/2224853

Neural Energy: The Science of Soul and Consciousness in Star Trek; and why we cannot replicate, but transport living beings - Star Trek: Website

Hey there, I have always been of the opinion that so-called Treknobabble actually (with only few exceptions) is internally consistent and makes sense if you accept some of its premises. It’s not just random words strung together, it makes sense if you simply listen to the characters and accept that their scientific understanding differs from ours. Therefore, this is actually a piece of head-canon that I assume is largely intentional, and it’s about the concept of a soul, and where consciousness comes from in the Trek universe. So far, I have not been disappointed with this explanation; and it actually explains some of the more illogical parts of how consciousness and “a soul” supposedly exist in Star Trek. Sentient beings in the Star Trek universe have a “soul”; some kind of energy field that is created by their neural system naturally. We call it a neural energy field or a bio-neural energy field; and we don’t yet know how to create or replicate ones ourselves, only how to move them. This is the reason why we cannot clone-transport or replicate conscious beings: we have a way to move the neuro-electric field from A to B via the transporter beam, but we cannot create any new ones; any living being we would replicate would be just cells, out of a consciousness, practically a zombie. That’s how we can transport someone from here to there, but not clone them; this is how we can replicate meat, but not a living animal. This is also how telepathy works: if consciousness is merely some kind of energy field, we can manipulate it however we want by simply applying physical methods. Let’s look at a few of the appearances in canon: - In VOY 1x13 (Cathexis), Chakotay’s “bio-neural energy” is displaced, practically his consciousness, and can even ‘enter’ other beings. This implies that his consciousness is separate from his body, and can be moved around, and even “possess” others: the mind is totally separate from the body. - In DIS 2x11/2x12, they store someone’s “bio-neural energy”, a representation of their consciousness, and it is said that it can uniquely identify a person. - According to DS9 4x10 (Our Man Bashir), during transport, someone’s “neural energy” pattern is stored within the transporter buffer. The energy pattern occupies a huge amount of memory and so cannot be stored for a long period of time. In the same episode, they also establish “neural energy” to be separate from the physical form. They use the word “store” instead of “save”; I think that’s because it’s literally something like a battery, not a photocopier. You can only move around the consciousness. - In VOY 4x13 (Waking Moments), they encounter a species which seems to be unconscious, but actually has a consciousness independent of its physical form; that even is able to pull others in with it. This is, once again, called a “neurogenic field”. This implies that the consciousness (the neural energy field) of people can be physically manipulated like any other energy, to induce hallucinations or dreams. - In VOY 6x05 (Alice), there is a “neurogenic interface”, which seems to enable the user to connect their own neuro-electric field with the computer in order to transfer data from one source to the other, to connect the consciousness to another body, so to speak. This mirrors the ability to possess others from Cathexis. - In ENT 4x10 (Daedalus) we find a disembodied transporter signal that contains a human’s consciousness and that can once again haunt things and people. This could very well be the person’s neuro-electric field from the pattern buffer, somehow broken free, in a very similar way to the independent-soul possession mechanics from Cathexis and Alice. - In TOS and Enterprise, we also see many references to the Vulcan concept of “katra”; a person’s consciousness, independent from a body, that can be stored in a device, transferred to others, and communicated with for example via a mind meld. Sound familiar? - In DS9 1x09 (The Passenger), Julian Bashir is possessed by a Vulcan’s consciousness, and Dax ends up removing the consciousness by using an “electromagnetic pulse” to “displace the pattern”. This once again strengthens the idea of consciousness being nothing but an electromagnetic field. There are tons more (literally, dozens [https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Neural_pattern]) examples of people’s consciousnesses being represented by some kind of electromagnetic field independent of their bodies; often called “neural pattern”, “neural energy”, or a variation thereof. It is surprisingly consistent. So, what about Data, and the Doctor, and all the other artificial life forms? It seems to be simple to say now that the “measure of a man” is simply whether they are able to create a neuro-electric field or not. However, if this was the case, the entire philosophical debate on whether Data is a being or not would not make much sense: they could simply scan him to find out whether there is, in fact, one, or not. I therefore assume that he does not have one (there is also no canon reference to any neuro-anything when it comes to Data), and that positronic brains “merely” simulate consciousness. I propose a more radical approach: it does not matter whether an artificial lifeform is actually conscious or only simulates consciousness perfectly; for all intents and purposes, they should be treated equal to all other beings.

I’ll start:

If you love the Department of Temporal Investigations and resolving all kinds of one-off time-related plot lines, check out the DTI novel series, starting with Watching The Clock!

Trek Lit, Novels & Fan Fiction Recommendation Thread!

https://startrek.website/post/2180673

Trek Lit, Novels & Fan Fiction Recommendation Thread! - Star Trek: Website

Hey there, I think it’s kind of sad that there isn’t much talk on here about the super cool novel-verse that Trek has, let alone the fan fiction community! Maybe this could be a starter thread for people recommending their favorite licensed or unlicensed works of Trek fiction, together with like a sentence to sell people on it! There’s so many points of the Star Trek universe that only novels, comics or even fan fiction explore, and as someone who loves writing plausible fiction about underexplored areas of the universe (like ancient Bajoran history or the day-to-day of an Earth citizen) I wish more people would engage with it. GO

Treklit/Novelverse: how to get up to speed on the lore?

https://startrek.website/post/2010181

Treklit/Novelverse: how to get up to speed on the lore? - Star Trek: Website

Hey there, I have finally been reading some of the Treklit that I was gifted some time ago, and I really loved them! The only problem is that I seem to be missing a lot of context. I read Revelation and Dust, apparently the first novel in the The Fall miniseries, and it is making references to the Typhon Pact, something that to my knowledge does not appear in the shows and that was entirely unknown to me. There’s characters and events that are set up to apparently be familiar to the reader that I never heard of. The original DS9 is gone and they built a second version? I mean, that’s really cool, but how did all that happen? I thought it’d be as straightforward as reading the aptly named Typhon Pact series, but according to Memory Alpha/Beta, that depends on canon and characters from Star Trek: Titan, and also the Destiny duology, and THOSE each depend on like dozens of other books! Is there a recommended reading order to get up to speed on all of these events post-TV shows? I watched all good shows (e. g. including ENT and no further), and I feel like I am missing a lot of context established in the novels. I would at least really like to understand what led up to The Fall, because it seems to be super intriguing. Who is President Bacco?

Canon-friendly Klingon flags that I can fly publicly?

https://startrek.website/post/2008861