- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 1 Posts
That’s not necessarily very easy. These certs would have to show up in public certificate transparancy logs for most browsers to accept them. If this happens on a government scale it would surely get noticed, though the question remains what you’re left to do if the government forces it anyways…
See en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_Transparency section “Mandatory certificate transparency”
If by RJ45 you mean erhernet over standard 8P8C (i.e. RJ45) your looking for SFP-T modules. Can’t connect that to your DSL line though since that’s not Ethernet.
There do seem to exist G.fast sfp modules for dsl, but do note that sadly sfp module and router brand incompatibility is sadly a thing.
Related note: At our company we also had quite some issues getting some of these more special sfp modules working (e.g. XGS-PON), so ymmv with a dsl one.
If your dsl is G.Fast you could try the Zyxel GM4100. That device is only a bridge
No I’m talking about VMs. It’s the baloon kernel driver which also works on Windows (though needs separate installation). It doesn’t work quite like containers though. The hypervisor dynamically adds/removes memory to the VM depending on total memory usage of the hypervisor.
Nowadays you can also assign a dynamic amount of memory. I’ve only ever used this with Linux VMs on Proxmox though, but I’m pretty sure it works with Windows as well
Pretty sure he’s confusing it with either SFP+ or SFP28.
OSFP is the current bleeding edge with 400Gb/s of bandwidth. The current primary use case for that is ISP networks or running datacenter scale computing. The going prices for a PCIE card seems to be about 2k and around 600 for a DAC-Cable alone… compared to this 200$ mini PC, OSPF is in a completely different customer segment.
What do you mean by expensive? It’s free open source software no?
I’m pretty sure he means 12$/year. 6$ per month is pretty expensive for a domain.
That doesn’t match my experience with AUR at all. Usually it pulls a specific git revision and checks the hash. This also ensures that the build shouldn’t suddenly fail to some extent.
Though it’s entirely possible that it’s not like this for all packages, though I find it kind of counterintuitive since your package manager wouldn’t know when to perform an update in this case.
A diagram of the relevant Hypervisor/VMs/containers + Network information would be helpful.
From where and how are you testing DNS? Did you use dig and specified the nameserver directly?