Oh, the irony of people using generative AI to "summarise" my papers π«
(here the real paper: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42113-024-00217-5)
Website | https://irisvanrooijcogsci.com |
Blog | https://metatheorist.com |
Book | https://cognitionandintractability.com |
https://twitter.com/IrisVanRooij |
Oh, the irony of people using generative AI to "summarise" my papers π«
(here the real paper: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42113-024-00217-5)
NEW paper! ππ₯οΈ
βCombining Psychology with Artificial Intelligence: What could possibly go wrong?β
β Brief review paper by @olivia Guest and myself, highlighting traps to avoid when combining Psych with AI, and why this is so important. Check out our proposed way forward! ππ‘
Full paper: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/aue4m
New π«
Letter to the Editor in Cognitive Science, by @samhforbes & @olivia Guest
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70058?domain=author&token=HPM4WIWZCT6HRVFFEZB3
"This paper provides theoretical results that indicate limits on what machine learning methods can achieve, even with all the data and computing power in the world"
- - post by Ronald de Haan on CertAIn (Center for Explainable, Responsible & Theory-Driven AI)
https://certain-ai.nl/papers/reclaiming-ai-as-a-theoretical-tool-for-cognitive-science/
This paper provides theoretical results that indicate limits on what machine learning methods can achieve, even with all the data and computing power in the world. The field of artificial intelligence, especially in its early days, has been interwoven with the study of human cognition. An important basic assumption that ties the two together is [β¦]
πWith this we close ACT 1 ("releasing the grip"), and we move to ACT 2 ("reclaiming the AI vertex") π
(Slide is from a recorded presentation of the paper. You can watch it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akuJqk2tDPo πΏπ¬ Or you can continue reading about ACT 2 in next tweets).
15/n