@verysimple @91toph @chucker @ariegoldshlager @taylorlorenz

And it wasn’t an email from just any employee. It was an email from a VP with apparent authority to make agreements.

@91toph @chucker @ariegoldshlager @taylorlorenz

Berenson got back on Twitter not because of 1A but because of promise made in email by a VP with apparent authority to bind corp which probably encouraged a settlement.

@goodlawproject

It was stuff that is currently needed: “The haul – amassed after desperate carers had been crying out for supplies – includes items originally meant for prisoners themselves.”

@davebirr @Jumb0 @taylorlorenz

And Jacobs lost the defamation claim in Oct 2021.

@91toph @steventdennis @ariegoldshlager @taylorlorenz

Twitter settled & it wasn’t because of 1A. Judge didn’t accept 1A claim; J allowed case to proceed based on breach of contract (because of promises made by a Twitter exec in email).

“Internet-service executives have always been instructed by lawyers not to talk with people about their individual accounts and not to make any promises about what might happen, Goldman said, “for reasons that should now be obvious.””

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/08/alex-berenson-twitter-ban-lawsuit-covid-misinformation/671219/

@davebirr @Jumb0 @taylorlorenz

Zillow is public information. If you read the story you wouldn’t assume that was a private home. That was an address Jacobs used for the business the story is about (which is basically a story about running a factory town for influencers).