Tencent does not care.

We can beat aipac. We’ve proven it in Illinois.

The first step to multiple parties is ranked choice voting. But honestly rather than multiple parties, no parties is the better format

This would be much more impactful if it actually balanced it compared to total suicide rates to demonstrate guns create a meaningful increase in suicide. Otherwise viewers will simply thing people are doing the same amount by other methods in other countries

They’ve made some incredibly and impressively stupid strategic errors even leaving aside poor preparation and the stupidity of attacking iran. That’s what happens when you put bootlickers in charge.

There’s a lot brigading state subreddits to influence elections right now :/

It creates far more issues than it benefits. Hiding enables bad actors much more so than not hiding does, as it allows them to more easily disguise their history of bad faith arguing.

You say “socialist democracy” as distinct from bourgeois elections but socialism describes an economic ideology, not a system of voting. It’s not a meaningful differentiator to show how your system is different. That alone makes me get the feeling you’re kinda just tossing word salads here. But, I would like you to explain what you mean before I dismiss it as such— perhaps it has a meaning I’m unfamiliar with.

precondition you wait for, it is forged through struggle. The 90% figure is wrong for a start, even in the US communist sympathys are quickly growing

Rapidly growing, part of why I’m optimistic in a peaceful solution. But I would say that’s much more for socialism than communism.

Bourgeois democracy won’t let you vote through its own abolition.

The beautiful part of democracy, even flawed ones, is that it can’t stop you once you gather enough support, it will bend to your will