People complain about AI possibly being unreliable, then actively root for things that are designed to make them unreliable.

Yeah, I read the entire comment and the key word was “anything”, which as you just admitted was in fact hyperbole. As I said it was.

It’s actually not overkill, because the way it responds (even for simple requests) can be tailored to help you understand things better. I’ve thrown everything at from simple stuff to complex stuff, and it does a really good job 90% of the time.

LLMs are an implementation on the way to AGI.

I just know where the future is headed. Gotta be realistic about it.

They are making investments in green energy for their data center usage.

Our current economic model is insufficient to handle advancement in technology.

I have never had issues finding out information about file formats, or finding conversion tools for them.

The AI is not the problem in this case. The economic model is. It is not an economic model suitable for the advancement of technology.

I didn’t think you’ve thought it through to it’s logical conclusion, and your example shows a demeaning attitude towards what AI can currently be used for. When you reduce it to what you view as ridiculous uses, you become lacking in the facts.

For example, the US and China are international and ideological competitors.

To say you’ve never gotten a fully correct result on anything has to be hyperbole. These things are tested. We know their hallucination rate, and it’s not 100%.