@georgetakei Here is the problem: All she has to do is stop voting with Mike Johnson and get 1-2 other women who threaten to do so and/or to vote for a different leader and *poof* they could have Mike's Johnsons in a vice grip to force the issue.
They won't because it doesn't matter that much to them. They just like the optics of being "against" it with out actually doing it (see, e.g., Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, etc.).
"WHEN I SEE TRUMP, I SEE THE SAME
REDNECKS I SAW WHEN I WAS GROWING
UP WHO CALLED ME NI**** AND TRIED TO
KEEP ME IN MY PLACE. THAT'S WHAT THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY IS TO ME. THEY'RE
DOING IT TO YOUNG PEOPLE, GAY
PEOPLE. THEY DON'T CARE WHO YOU ARE.
IF YOU'RE NOT THEM, YOU'RE THE ENEMY."
If this new chatbot is so efficient, why do you need to force your employees to use it? Why do you need to advertise the fact that you are using it? Are you that insecure?
If I truly had a powerful tool, I would not talk about it. I would only show it to my employees, asking them to not tell the competition about it. And I will let the employees discover by themselves how efficient it is by giving bonuses to the most efficient.
Because a LOT of people are missing the point:
No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".
But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.
Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.
So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.