Decent (portrait/indoor) flash for Sony A7
Hiya! Any recommendations for a nice flash for the Sony A7 series? I currently own an A7iii, but I’m debating an upgrade to the A7iv or A7v whenever it’s released. I mostly shoot with my Sony 40mm G, Tamron 35-150mm, and Tamron 17-28mm. Links to good buying guides would be great, too! (not AI generated slop recapping Amazon’s top 10) Budget is rather arbitrary as long as price/quality is upheld.
Experience with LGPL dependencies?
Licensing strategies
So I’m currently re-evaluating my startup company’s licensing policy. Things have grown organically and it feels like a good time to set things up properly and sustainably. We have a domain specific language with a fully fledged compiler for which we would like to make (corporate/proprietary) adoption easy but have this core and changes to it remain open: sounds like LGPL might fit the bill for the library work behind this? Any other candidates? We want to promote open sourcing any extensions or integrations of the language. We also maintain our own analysis and visualization (VS Code) extensions and applications that build on these libraries, but I’m a bit more hesitant here. There’s so much time invested in this that we do not want this to be “up for grabs” so we’re thinking of GPL or even AGPL here, but consider a dual licensing clause to redeem some development hours if corporate parties want to incorporate that in their product. Is that unreasonable?
Licensing strategies
Licensing strategies
I’m currently re-evaluating my startup company’s open source licensing strategy. We’re currently the only contributor to our projects (yet) so we have some freedom to change I believe. TLDR: is LGPL for core libraries and AGPL+dual licensing (on request) for client applications a sensible strategy? Is dual licensing sustainable or a big no-no? We have a domain specific language with a fully fledged compiler for which we would like to make (other product/external/corporate/proprietary) adoption easy but have this core and changes to it remain open: sounds like LGPL might fit the bill for the core library work? Any other license candidates? We want to promote open sourcing any extensions or integrations of the language as well but regular GPL and dual (paid) licensing seems a bridge too far to encourage adoption in other products. We also maintain our own analysis and visualization (VS Code) extensions and client apps/libs that build on these core libraries, but I’m a bit more hesitant here. There’s so much time invested in all this that we do not want this to be “up for grabs” without sharing alike so we’re thinking of GPL or even AGPL here, but consider a dual licensing clause to redeem some development hours if corporate parties want to incorporate our stuff in their proprietary product.
Community moderation vs censorship
Why is any informational discourse regarding anything not strictly OSI-style open source immediately removed by moderators in this community? How can we expect people to educate themselves through censorship instead of public discussion? I’m looking for an open source licensing strategy for my own startup company and discussing the do’s, don’ts or even perception of different licenses and strategies seems highly important to the community to me. I could understand if it was actively promoting something ‘bad’ or wouldn’t mind having clear tags or disclaimers that underline what is or isn’t strictly OSI but it feels a bit too rigorous right now 😕
Noodgevallen en beheer
Laat ik vooropstellen dat ik enorm blij ben dat er al een redelijk bevolkte Nederlandse Lemmy instance bestaat. Maar met instances als deze of bijvoorbeeld tchncs.de [http://tchncs.de] bekruipt mij toch altijd het gevoel dat het risicovol is met één persoon als beheerder. Moet de instance dan ‘gewoon’ verlaten worden in de hoop dat een nieuwe opkomt als de beheerder uit beeld raakt of wat dan ook? Hoort deze fase van instances gewoon bij het zijn van ‘early adopter’? Ik zou het heel vet vinden om een stichting of iets anders op te richten of te sponsoren als die zich in zou zetten voor een NL rijtje gefedereerde services met behoorlijke statuten die de gebruikers beschermen. Ik betaal daar met liefde en plezier een (vrijwillige) subscriptie voor van een paar € per jaar. Of bestaat dit al?