Whatever people have been saying about Mac OS tahoe, I have to say that it has not been harsh enough.

There is absolutely zero thought to the interface apart from design wankery. I’ve been using computers with a GUI since 1988 with the Atari ST and GEM, and I’ve never struggled so much to parse an interface. Giving content priority means that the means of interaction
with the content is diminished. This is a computing platform not a photo frame.

Everything has a consequence, and no decision can be classed as a good decision.

There’s only so much I can do.

If a document should be a PDF, then it will be published in word or PowerPoint.

If a document should be editable, then all of a sudden people know how to convert to PDF.

So - do any other disciplines have an issue with a work being repeatedly quoted while being highly unlikely the authors have read the original source ?

Patricia Benner, Benjamin Bloom, and now Gary Rolfe…. all spring to mind….

Also interesting that a model being used at post grad is one I would have been rejected at undergraduate level.