No, they claim it is for a good reason to excuse it so they can get away with all the stuff they want later whilst hopefully (from their perspective) making more profit now. It’s the thin end of a wedge.

Stop defending corporations for anti-consumer behaviour. You do realise that YOU are a consumer as well, right?

That’s exactly what arbitrary is. It’s not for a good reason, it’s so they can push bullshit later. The limitations were chosen arbitrarily because they’re not real limitations, they’re entirely imposed by a Microsoft for their own ends. A non-arbitrary limitation is like minimum graphics card requirements for a game - won’t run without it. What do you think arbitrary means?

You’re missing the point. The return isn’t going to go to tax payers, it’s going to go to rich people, so it’s not a return, it’s just paying rich people who weren’t even involved. Enriching the rich like everything else the republicans do.

Yes. Of course. Because that’s what will happen, that money will go into improving services for the public rather than being funnelled into a rich pricks pockets. Totally what will happen, no reason to doubt that whatsoever.

I read that Palahniuk prefers the ending in the movie.

Isn’t the book super pro-fascism?

What a manipulative headline. By premium, they mean it won’t be free to play, and leaving the fact that they also said it won’t be full priced out of the headline makes it clickbait. Fuck that awful website.

Premium in this context means it’ll cost money. Not full priced means it won’t be £70.

Single player campaigns are literally the best type of games. Fomo bullshit, constant nagging to buy stuff, and relying on internet dickheads for the experience and hoping they won’t just grief or insult everyone the whole time is awful.