I firmly believe shit like this annoys him more than anything else.

This is isn’t conservationism though. They’re not trying to maintain the status quo. They’re trying to go backwards.

Their ideology is to not want free and fair elections.

Tactful.

There’s similarities, but it’s a little more empty, and it’s a little too reposty from other sites still. reddit then felt a bit more like the place, this isn’t that yet.

Present.

Silly me, not trying to sound dumb. Guess you got me.

I’ve never killed anyone, and I almost certainly never will. Should we make it law to say I can, just because we’re sure I won’t?

You’re shitting on the very concept of a thought experiment and of a hypothetical. What you’re doing is like saying “The law should say you should be able to murder whoever you like so long as the sky is green, because the sky is never green”. This is a tactic to avoid addressing the issue. Namely, even if you don’t think something is going to happen, why would you allow it, if it absolutely musn’t?

They say it is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it, but if you absolutely refuse to entertain it for strategic reasons, change the date. A healthy fetus, a few days passed due date, maybe no more than week from labour, could easily be induced, mother decides “Actually nah”, takes a bunch of pills to kill it - you good with that?