0 Followers
0 Following
1 Posts

Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs

https://sh.itjust.works/post/57571819

Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs - sh.itjust.works

Paper by, > Simon Lermen, Daniel Paleka, Joshua Swanson, Michael Aerni, Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr It talks about deanonymizing those who writes under a pseudonym. Sites like reddit, lemmy would be that type. From the paper, > Given two databases of pseudonymous individuals, each containing unstructured text written by or about that individual, we implement a scalable attack pipeline that uses LLMs to: (1) extract identity-relevant features, (2) search for candidate matches via semantic embeddings, and (3) reason over top candidates to verify matches and reduce false positives. > Our results show that the practical obscurity protecting pseudonymous users online no longer holds and that threat models for online privacy need to be reconsidered. They can match writing styles, interests, details to infer a job or city, or other unstructured information. That allows to match unrelated pseudonyms to the same person. Like, FooFighterGroupie and Yolanda43905 are the same human, despite they never said it. It can allow also, to match a pseudonym to a real identity across sites. Like someone posted on LinkedIn with a real name. It takes less info than most people expect, to figure out Julia Greenberg of Cedarville, NH is FooFighterGroupie. You can protect yourself by never giving away much info. But ofc sometimes that’s the whole point! Think talking about specific hobbies or w/e, gives away info. Also change up writing styles + vocab use, b/c it is a unique fingerprint. I doubt this technique is used in a dragnet way… YET! But no reason it can’t scale, if the cost of resources goes low eonugh. We could eventually see it become standard, analysis to link people across sites and identities.

Is it possible to see only new post replies?

https://sh.itjust.works/post/55755646

Is it possible to see only new post replies? - sh.itjust.works

I’m new to Lemmy, days not weeks. Liking it so far and I’m trying to contribute in a positive way to the instance. I have one usability issue, trying to figure out which replies in a post are new since I last read it. I see the number like (4 New) telling me how many, but not which. Sorting by “New” hardly helps because of the threaded display. Threading is a good thing, IMO, since it preserves the flow of the conversation. But new replies to older replies get buried with a “New” sort. When the post has only a few replies total, I can keep up simply by re-scanning the whole thread. On more popular posts that becomes infeasible. Please don’t beat me up too bad if I’m missing an obvious thing! I saw the user settings, “Show Read Posts”, but that seems to be post level, not reply level.

Car (lack of) privacy, and what to do about it. Let's talk about this?

https://sh.itjust.works/post/55596341

Car (lack of) privacy, and what to do about it. Let's talk about this? - sh.itjust.works

Many of us know how bad modern cars are for privacy. Yet many of our friends and neighbors do not realize how intrusive it really is. I linked a blog entry from Mozilla’s investigation about car privacy. In that blog is a link to their make-by-make analysis. The amount of very intimate information a modern car collects is honestly appalling. It includes things like health data, real time mood information, weight gain or loss, and so on. And it does so even for passengers. The web has many resources talking about this problem, but almost no resources on what to do about it. I know the simple thing is to say, “just drive an old car bro!” That’s fine if you can, but not everyone can do that. Also it has drawbacks like more maintenance. Sometimes less safety if it’s older than certain safety features. For the purpose of this thread, it is more interesting to focus on newer, surveillance enabled cars which are the majority of what people drive on the road today. Some people have figured out how to bypass the surveillance package on some cars. One way is to uncouple the antenna it uses to phone home. Other times you can bypass the telematics module or remove a fuse that powers it. I feel like we really need a central model by model repository of information. Past that, how do we prove it has worked, if we do it? Has anyone reading this tried to use an RF detector to see if their car is still trying to phone home, after they have disconnected a telematics antenna? What are your experiences? I want to buy one and use it to test my own car, but the info on the web seems sketch.