0 Followers
0 Following
3 Posts
Ex Royal Artillery. Ex BT. Prog rock, scifi, beer and veggie loving cat butler living in Ware UK.

Moria Falls

Wonder if anyone will pick up on this.

Never had a problem with mine.
I’m 66.

I tried to explain this to my daughter in law when she suggested my wife just use the same password for everything, including online banking.

Ended up in a big row about how she doesn’t give a shit because she has nothing to hide.

Didn’t talk to me for a week.

Thinking about that, perhaps I should rack it up as a success 😏

So far. One the nob ends find a way in it’ll not be as friendly, that’s why blocking them and their instances promptly is important. I saw something on blocklists the other day and will look into that. I may be totally wrong, but to me it sounds like the filters we’d use in uBlock Origin or similar. Sounds good to me.
No. We don’t ; -)

I don’t mind paying a licence fee if it goes towards Sir David etc. But you’ve got to question wages that allow ‘tens of thousands’ to be splashed (oo-er) in only three years.

And BBC wonder why people complain about them.

Clean the oven, make some bread (cheating with breadmaker today), do some washing.

Not much else as wife had tooth out yesterday and is feeling a bit out of sorts.

What an exciting life!

BBC presenter accused of paying teen for explicit photos - report

https://lemmy.world/post/1192002

BBC presenter accused of paying teen for explicit photos - report - Lemmy.world

I’m OK with BBC having the licence fee when it pays for people like Sir David Attenborough, Prof Brian Cox and Chris Packham to make some of the best stuff going, but the bloke in this inquiry supposedly paid tens of thousands in just three years. Why has he got that much money to splash out (oo-er) on some pictures? The BBC wonder why people rail against them. Here’s a clue.

And don't we know it!