I am not insinuating a pro Trump bias for this article (I still haven’t bothered to even look at the source long enough to even tell you who it is). I’m pointing out clear misinformation in the headline. In this case yes it would serve the current administration’s purposes nicely. And yes, quotation marks would pretty nearly solve my problem with it.

I understand where you are going with your explanation. But it’s a headline, not a government press release. I know that administration isn’t concerned with the truth, the media should be. Calling it a drug boat with no evidence shows a huge lack of journalists integrity and in a just world someone would be fired for that.

Why are they calling it a drug strike? There hasn’t been any evidence of drugs.

I find this particular argument strange:

“Dude had suicidal thoughts/machinations long before he used Chatgtp”

So… You’re saying that this person was in crisis for awhile, but managed to not kill himself UNTIL he used your service which helped him plan it?

How … how is that a reasonable argument?

What was her point?

Ah spoilers!

I’m always at least a day behind because of time difference. Don’t know the rules in the community but if I get spoilers, I’m out fast.

What is the world is this about?

I feel bad for the birds.

But I should have been feeling that way last fuxking year when they needed to be put down. Those people risked wild and farm birds and human health and safety for months and the outcomes were A: they got lucky and the survivors were not infected or B: shit gets real and those assholes felt they had the right to take that risk for all of us.

This is the drunk driver who made it home saying “it’s fine see nothing happened.”

I’m sure they won’t face appropriate consequences but at least their behaviour wasn’t rewarded any longer.

I’d give it a go.

Read in his voice.

I do admire his line of reasoning. Just every time. Like I used to do silly things in the sims and theme park, but his natural curiosity is next level. HOLD PLEASE.