0 Followers
0 Following
1 Posts
  • the case mortality rate is, by far, one of the worst we’ve ever seen for an influenza. cdn.who.int/media/docs/…/ai_20250131.pdf
  • we already have a vaccine for it en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/H5N1_vaccine
  • don’t panic but be educated m.youtube.com/watch?v=5CyVi4UzKxE
  • It’s a joy to watch you work in real time, keep it up

    To add to this, the ask isn’t to build more apartments, the ask is to LET US

    Single Family Zoning makes higher density housing illegal. If there are people who WANT to live in apartments they don’t have that freedom because it’s illegal in so much of the US.

    No one wants to force you to live in an apartment, we just want to be able to choose to if we want to. let the market decide if we want houses or apartments

    Here’s a bunch more

    imgur.com/a/LxXXg

    190 Retro Video Game Ads - Album on Imgur

    Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much more from users.

    Imgur

    I think you haven’t read the article

    Both women literally already got their cars back

    They’re suing because the process was, as another commenter said, a huge pain in the ass

    “Culley and Sutton’s argument for a separate preliminary hearing appears in many respects to be a backdoor argument for a more timely hearing so that a property owner with a good defense against forfeiture can recover her property more quickly,” he wrote. “But the court’s precedents already require a timely hearing.” Alabama has since amended its forfeiture law to allow owners of seized property to request expedited hearings. “Our decision today does not preclude those legislatively prescribed innovations,” Justice Kavanaugh wrote. “Rather, our decision simply addresses the base-line protection of the due process clause.”

    Seems like it’s less about civil forfeiture and more about how quickly can they get their property back when civil forfeiture happens

    3,6,15,24,44,60 - OEIS

    I think it’s fine as it is. It’s trading funny for poignanncy

    Can anyone explain why we care?

    I’m out of the loop