But the year 2024 isn’t some sort of religious believe, it’s just that we picked the birth of Jesus as a starting point, and started counting from there. Any point in time could’ve been an epoch, just the current Gregorian calendar is so ingrained that it will be difficult to switch. Or is my understanding about this wrong?

Doesn’t it serve justice to the families and friends of the people who he has killed? I can’t imagine them feeling a sense of justice when their tax dollars are put to work to get this guy back into society.

Do you think the families of the victims prefer this as well? Personally I would think the death penalty would give those families closure once it’s done.

I haven’t really picked a side, mostly because there’s just not enough evidence. NYT hasn’t provided any of the prompts they used to prove their claim. The OpenAI blog post seems to make suggestions about what happened, but they’re obviously biased.

If the model spits out an original article by just providing a single paragraph, then the NYT has a case. If like OpenAI says that part of the prompt were lengthy excerpt, and the model just continued with the same style and format, then I don’t think they have a case.

That’s what OpenAI insinuates in their post; openai.com/blog/openai-and-journalism

The OpenAI blog posts mentions;

It seems they intentionally manipulated prompts, often including lengthy excerpts of articles, in order to get our model to regurgitate.

It sounds like they essentially asked ChatGPT to write content similar to what they provided. Then complained it did that.

Does that imply that any billionaire hunter / team is also fair game for the billionaires to hunt down? Sounds like a bad plan, where the billionaires can legally kill.

Every clip I ever seen about him just made me think he’s a fraud who’s good at talking. He’ll say things in a certain way to make it sound interesting, but really he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

How should the company be protecting user data, when - like you said -, the average person doesn’t take cybersecurity seriously, are not techies, don’t use a computer outside the office, and just want to log into their account with a password they remember?

Are you basically just saying the company should’ve enforced 2FA? Or maybe one of those “confirm you’re logging in” emails, every time they want to log in?

You’re right, but that was my point, you have to take a screenshot and translate it. It wasn’t something I thought about when my phone was blasting out a loud alarm.

In those kind of emergencies, either it should’ve been auto translated to the users’ default language, or a quick translate option should be available.