I teach a large bachelor level Phil of Science course at a business school. A substantial part of the course addresses how science is difficult (e.g. covering topics such as the replication crisis, human biases, why social phenomena are often difficult to measure/construct, causality etc.) I also want to rebuild trust in science, e.g. presenting topis such as science as a collective process, falsification etc. As an accessible take on this I use https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken/), Any (other) suggestions?
Science Isn’t Broken
If you follow the headlines, your confidence in science may have taken a hit lately. Peer review? More like self-review. An investigation in November uncovered a scam in which researchers were rubber-stamping their own work, circumventing peer review at five high-profile publishers.