True, but despite that it’s not possible to tell him to fuck off either. Europe has no good options here.

Four.

No, quite the opposite. You claimed that “It’s their money to invest” without knowing if it’s the case or not.

No, that’s not what I said. Do you have trouble with reading?

I do indeed, and I think that it’s a remarkably disngenuous and biased take.

It’s their money to invest only if it comes with no strings attached, no obligations to use it for a specific purpose. We don’t know if this is the case, so there’s no basis to argue that they can do whatever they want with it.

What is corruption? It’s a form of dishonesty that is undertaken by a person or an organization that is entrusted in a position of authority. That certainly seems to be the case here - not by SpaceX, but by Musk and his involvement in the government.

And Musk has everything to do with Grok.

A kind of profascist authoritarian computerised dystopia, a combination “1984” and “Brave New World” with digital oligarchy, total surveillance, killer robots and unsafe self-driving cars in the world increasingly subject to natural catastrophes due to deepening climate change.

Name a thing that is unbiased. It’s generally significantly less biased than humans are.

What could they realistically do, when Trump controls all branches of government from Congress to the Supreme Court? It can be argued that they should have shut down his government in March, when they had the chance to reject the spending bill - but what can they do now?

It’s not generally a worse chatbot than others - that is, until Musk manages to ruin it completely.