Should the industry start to move away from the use of the term Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) as a way of describing a cyber intruder? Due to its broad use across several threat-actor categories it seems to be used indiscriminately to describe all types of attacks. If media reporting and industry discussions label everything from highly motivated financial threats to nation-state actors as "APT", maybe it's time the term is retired.
I’m an experienced cyber‑security professional with a career spanning two decades of service with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. During my tenure I've led investigative cyber‑operations, risk‑assessment initiatives, and incident‑response teams that protected high‑technology environments from emerging threats. My work has consistently emphasized rapid triage, thorough forensic analysis, and the implementation of advanced mitigation techniques that keep critical systems secure.
I possess a Master’s in Information Security and have graduated from the SANS Institute with a Graduate Certificate in Cyber Defense among other degrees. I also hold a portfolio of industry certifications - including the ISC2 CISSP, multiple SANS credentials, numerous CompTIA and other industry specific certifications. These qualifications underpin a deep technical expertise that bridges policy, architecture, and hands‑on threat hunting.
| Website | https://www.kraudelt.com |
| Credly | https://www.credly.com/users/anthonykraudelt/badges |
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthonykraudelt/ |
