@[email protected]

I think rewards need to be purely cosmetic and not influence default ordering. Users should also be able to turn off reward viability.

That way you get all of the benefits with none of the drawbacks.

Yea the comments are all as I expected them to be

Happy to see, Google maps I’ve found hard to replace. but it’s a marathon not a sprint

You can easily replace Beef in your diet with foods that aren’t as bad for the environment. It won’t taste the same but so what.

You can’t cry that nobody needs AI but then in the same breath say that you can’t replace beef Something 100x worse for the environment.

Yes nobody NEEDS AI, just like nobody NEEDS beef, or to take a flight, but it’s still a nice to have and useful to a lot of people.

There are many reasons to be Anti-AI, the biggest one for me is Privacy & Manipulation.

But saying AI is brining the planet is BS (when you compared to other basics)

Read the actual article, that’s my whole point. We’re in somewhat of an echo chamber so people just upvote anything that says AI = BAD

I’m against AI for privacy reasons and other reasons, but the environment argument is a joke when you consider how little of an impact it has compared to streaming YouTube etc.

It’s already included in the 3Wh calculation

Fair, it’s not bad in comparison with things like Beef or Streaming 4k

But it’s still bad

Probably still worse than a couple of AI prompts