Thank you for your service.

No, most of the debt is owned domestically by the people

Red dress? That sounds like some lgbtxyz woke extreme leftism. Everyone knows the first amendment shields me from any criticism for the words I say and allows me to openly push my flavor of Christianity.

/s obviously.

I'm more of an elliptical orbit kinda guy. Sometimes I almost get it but most of the time the point just keeps getting farther and farther away.

What you are referring to is known as Appeasement and, historically, has been a bad idea.

I don't run, but when I do it's not at the 18 mile mark but the 3 minute mark where my bodies like "it's all gotta go"

That's the mark of a website you can trust.

Right. That's the point. Keep the law vague for selective enforcement

Nah, there is always more Intel to be gained. We've seen how Russia fares against those weapon systems and now it's a question of how will they change their strategy? If the US makes a prediction about new Russian doctrine, will the US assessment be accurate or does the US intelligence apparatus need to rethink it's analysis procedure. In a conflict heavy with drone usage, what can we learn about their use and more importantly, countermeasures, both on the adversarial side and blue side.

Anyway my point is that there is always more to learn from your opponent.