It's FOSSFirefox finally supports in-browser translations.
0xc0rvu5
- 6 Followers
- 36 Following
- 105 Posts
Amor fati
@hkrn Google is allowing their lackeys (US politicians) to allow someone to challenge them? Seems like a publicity stunt. If the US really cared about the monopolization of businesses as they once had, then there would still be healthy business competition & not the same 5-10 companies buying out all the others. Illusion of choice is not a choice. it is tyranny in plain sight.
@hkrn the S&P 100 caving in to riots and public/private property destruction. It's good to know these tactics can be utilized in future endeavors to right wrongs then. At least, that's the message I see being sent.
The Tor ProjectLooking for file transfers you can trust? We're continuing with our how to series by exploring OnionShare for safe and secure file sharing using the Tor network.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwyU2dZ3LJEoTzE6v4SAZNGl2Kv4MuePT
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwyU2dZ3LJEoTzE6v4SAZNGl2Kv4MuePT
How to safely and securely share any file using the Tor network with OnionShare
@garlickles about time there's some sort of forward movement for US infrastructure/transpo
@hkrn now only at least 100 more to go...
@therealahall it's a Google bypasser for trivial questions. Sure, when it comes to more complex topics, it cannot be trusted. I've witnessed many errors in regards to coding questions. That can be agreed upon. In respect to blindly accepting the answer as truth, well, most should always find the source and/or source their work. Obviously, that doesn't happen via GPT or googling for many people. For the sure majority with lower IQ it can avoid misinfo to an extent (non-expert topics); dangerous, I think not. If you are smart enough to be in a serious role, I doubt there would be a serious need for it, hence ruling out the dangerous factor.
@therealahall I understand it may not be authentic, but at least there is a better probability of it being accurate. Interesting times we live in
@hkrn I'm not a big fan of Newsom, but if he goes through with it and follows suite behind Oregon, he should be awarded some brownie points. Let's be frank, the "war on drugs" is a less fitting name than "the war on poor people using recreational drugs". Those with $ don't have to deal with legalities, and "the war on drugs" has generated millions of "criminals" by the US gov'ts criteria.
@hkrn 1% own the majority of wealth severely effecting inequality. Before its deemed 12% "need to" stop eating meat, we should seriously consider the 1% & their incompetence w/ their $ usage. Clearly, they aren't bright enough to use it to find innovative ways to reduce a carbon footprint without removing current standards. They are obviously weak at the top and must be replaced w/ people more willing to utilize their $ for the greater good.