nanohaApr 26, 2017

I'd just like to interject for moment. What you're refering to as C++, is in fact, C/C++, or as I've recently taken to calling it, C plus plus plus. C++ is not a programming language unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning C system made useful by the C stdlibs, C preprocessor and vital build system components comprising a full language as defined by ANSI.

Many compiler users run a modified version of the C language every day, without realizing it. Through a peculia

Show thread✧✦Catherine✦✧Apr 26, 2017
@nanoha this is actually a good question, is it possible to meaningfully run a system on C++ but without C at all?
Show threadMunin, Keeper of LoreApr 26, 2017

@whitequark @nanoha

C++ lets you compile C, doesn't it?

Show thread✧✦Catherine✦✧Apr 26, 2017
@munin @nanoha nope, common misconception! e.g. `new` is a valid variable name in C but not in C++
Show threadMunin, Keeper of LoreApr 26, 2017

@whitequark @nanoha

Huh. I could have sworn you could get mixed C/C++ codebases in. Wonder why my head had that.

Show threadMunin, Keeper of LoreApr 26, 2017

@nanoha @whitequark

....oh, I bet it's the linker letting you pull in stuff from C libraries, isn't it.

Show thread✧✦Catherine✦✧Apr 26, 2017
@munin @nanoha Both. You can mix C and C++ code in different compilation units as long as you tell C++ to use the C ABI (extern "C"), and *also* you can write polyglot code that compiles both as C and as C++ and does the same thing, but the latter is by no means completely trivial as the languages differ semantically quite a bit as well.
Show threadMunin, Keeper of Lore

@whitequark @nanoha

The latter sounds like it would lead to all kinds of madness, so I'm naturally going to have to attempt it sometime - though I've not seriously touched C++ since the 1990s...

The former must have been what I was thinking about.

Apr 26, 2017 at 10:45pmWeb