Is it the case that the psychological reliance on certain objects derives from their semiotic potency, in that they comfort us against our own internal fears, anxieties, beliefs, and uncertainties, regardless of their impotence in reality?

I began to suspect this when I felt compelled to wear a ring rather than do the actual hard work of open communication and vulnerability in a certain relationship. It didn't even make me feel better, though I did it for weeks, and changed nothing.

The more I consider this, the more I think it's equivalent to the idea that all adornment is, at heart, an attempt to compensate for perceived inadequacy or insecurity.

I don't know, but hope that this is not true, it feels harsh and insensitive. Perhaps it is wildly dismissive of everyone with a different set of damage than me, a different worldview. Perhaps my assertion is in insecurity, in that I am never comfortable in or with any adornment beyond the minimum...