I don't even want to hear about free speech. You aren't entitled to someone else's attention. Trolling is not a Constitutional right. You want to do that, spin up your own instance.

And certainly, someone could start a free-speech-anarchist instance with all pest controls off. For mastodon.social, though, I think they have a real responsibility to crack down on this shit.

The right to abuse is not about freedom. It silences people. It restricts freedom and expression—it never enhances it.

@csilverman The problem is the lack of transparency. Gargron doesn't make it apparent to new users that he's blocking big chunks of the Fediverse.
@sonya @csilverman oh, m.s is blocking some instances? #til

@abackstrom @sonya Curious, how do you know this? On what grounds is he blocking them?

I couldn't find a Mastodon CoC anywhere. I found this (https://mastodon.social/terms) which, unfortunately, doesn't have anything close to a CoC at all.

I realize that they're still trying to get all their ducks in order and legal docs take time, but having a clear "no abuse" policy seems pretty important, especially given that rampant abuse is the reason why a lot of us are here.

@csilverman @abackstrom here's some background on this:

1) https://community.highlandarrow.com/notice/816385

2) https://community.highlandarrow.com/notice/807252

(partisan sources but still good for getting up to speed)

I didn't realize how much of the Fediverse was blocked from .social until I switched to Maly because .social was struggling with bear the traffic. Then I was pissed that this wasn't made clear up-front.

@sonya imho having the admin block other servers in the fediverse without telling their users is rather unethical. I think users can decide for themselves who they do or don't want to interact with. There can be exceptions to this in the case of servers hosting illegal content.