I’ve got Evan Prodromou blocked so I didn’t see https://tags.pub when it was announced. If you missed it too: it’s a service that listens on relays for hashtags, and boosts posts containing them, to followers following any given hashtag. To give hashtags much more reachability despite the horizon of federation.

I proposed something like this in the context of natural disaster response. Users could come to a consensus on what hashtag to use for, say, # HurricaneFoobar, and posts containing the hashtag could spread far and wide. But because I care about safety, I suggested that it needed selective outbound relaying, so that only posts containing a list of opted-in hashtags were sent to the relay. I see that managing what gets sent to relays is out of scope for tags.pub.

I also don’t see any mention on the github issue list about tags.pub being able to defederate known bad actors, so I guess there’s nothing stopping your posts from reaching poast and friends, due to ActivityPub’s nontransitive defederation behaviour.

User-to-user and user-to-instance blocks will similarly get laundered, so if you let tags.pub boost your posts you may find unwelcome people reading your posts.

So, this is a cool idea, it could be helpful, but it’s not ready yet IMO.

tags.pub

@futzle yet another "add a tag to your profile to control it" which automatically puts it in the bin as far as I'm concerned.

If you think your service needs something this, maybe work on some general profile extension method to allow user preference flagging for new/unknown application permissions first.

But no, I guess that's not cool and fun.

@mike @futzle it's very cool and fun. The cleanest way to opt out is just to block the server. We also respect #NoBots because so many people have it on their profiles. We added #NoTagsPub so if people for some reason wanted other bots but not ours, they could fine tune it.

I think it's a good idea to add a "relayable" flag to accounts; I'll add a FEP for it and we'll implement it.

@evan @mike @futzle not the new website boy of the moment replying to a thread specifically wherein people name him being blocked but not to threads with users genuinely offering input openly.

weeee
@evan @futzle why should I be navigating you through your own thread responses?

for example, the response I literally gave you? yknow, the one with over 30 engagements at time of writing? the one wherein I provided insight onto the safety concerns and the ways in which other decisions could help make users safe?

it is very telling that you choose to interact with the post wherein its possible to play the victim instead of having dialogue. classic cis-white guy behaviour.

https://blahaj.zone/notes/ao0jxgd6h2kc043z

RE: https://blahaj.zone/notes/ao0jxgd6h2kc043z