@chefx @chrisoliver @pluralistic We could use some kind of system where ownership of a movie sold (to own) is registered, and if one company turns evil or goes bust, other members of the scheme make sure it is still available to the buyer.
But it would be *huge*, and probably prone to errors.
@chefx @chrisoliver @pluralistic I grew up with 405 lines, then 625 lines PAL. A well-made DVD is fine for me and I buy the ones I really want to keep, and rip them for a backup in case the disc dies. Same for a lot of music.
But I think the streams need the same clear concepts of rental and ownership--progress is when things get better for people, not when they get worse.
@chefx @chrisoliver @pluralistic
They will have it all buried in the EULA that you have to sign/click.
It would be nice if someone had the time and money to take them to court to challenge the EULA. Just because something is written in a contract doesn't make it legal/fair or binding.
@raymierussell @chefx @chrisoliver @pluralistic
California has a law against this kind of thing.
@svavar @chefx @chrisoliver @pluralistic
I am not sure that this is really going to solve the problem. Just being slightly more transparent about an industry practise that should really shouldn't exist is a bit meh.
Full disclosure.
I don't buy digital movies, tv etc.
Or subscribe to pay streamers.
I use legit free with ads streamers (luckily the UK has a lot of broadcasters with this type of service) and buy physical media if possible for the content I want.
@chefx @chrisoliver @pluralistic
This is turbo annoying when it comes to physical devices that need an app to be useful.
Lots of devices are being bricked because the vendor canβt be arsed to keep the servers running or provide an offline mode.
@chefx @chrisoliver @pluralistic won't be made illegal we've seen in stop killing gamt that the bribe of all governement is deep.
So if buying is not owning ... Downloading is not stealing.