We keep hearing we can't be 'competitive' without hugging AI, & yet a growing body of research asserts this is in fact bovine manure.

Check out this steely take from Nobel Laureate (Econ) Daron Acemoglu:

"[...]roughly 0.55% in total factor productivity gains is what AI will actually deliver over the next decade, a fraction of Wall Street’s euphoric projections."

He insists what we should really b focusing on is that AI is simply about vastly extending corporate power

https://fortune.com/2026/06/21/nobel-laureate-daron-acemoglu-ai-productivity-capitalism-democracy/

Nobel Laureate Daron Acemoglu on the ‘brainless’ AI discourse, the myth of capitalism and the Gen Z revolution risk

The MIT economist and Nobel Prize winner doesn't mince words: most of what you're reading about AI is wrong, and the stakes for getting it right are existential.

Fortune

@JulianOliver

Here's Daron Acemoglu making a point I often also make - even down to the example of markets in the Soviet Union...

"“I don’t like the term capitalism,” he [Acemoglu] said. “It makes it sound like there is a uniform model that includes Sweden, Egypt, Argentina, Honduras, the United States, South Korea, Japan. There’s no overlap between these economies, how they are organized.” The only overlap he sees is that they have markets, “but so did the Soviet Union.”

"His preferred frame, developed across Why Nations Fail and The Narrow Corridor with co-author James Robinson, is inclusive versus extractive institutions. The question isn’t whether a country has markets, but whether its economic and political rules broaden participation and reward innovation — or whether they concentrate power at the top and extract value from everyone else."