The big story emerging from yesterday's primary results is that Progressive Dems are winning everywhere by big margins over their establishment Corporate Dem opponents. #WeThePeople are taking over the Democratic Party.

How to spot the difference:

Takes money from AIPAC, AI and Crypto PACs >>> CorpDem
Supported by Schumer, Jeffries >>> CorpDem

Refuses to take money from AIPAC, AI and Crypto PACs >>> ProgDem
Supported by Mamdani, Pritzker, Warren, Sanders, AOC >>> ProgDem

#ProgressiveDemocrat

@mastodonmigration Unfortunately, presidential elections are always determined by independents in the middle, who are not inclined to vote for what they view as candidates at the far end. For example, polls showed that the entire complex of issues around sexuality and sports was an enormous turn-off for the middle, and pushed them enough toward Trump to make the difference. That's just the unfortunate reality. Middle of the road, safe candidates usually win, except in extraordinary circumstances (e.g., Biden's obvious denial of a steep mental decline). Remember, Trump won't be running again (no matter what he says).
@lauren @mastodonmigration Not really. Turnout is a major factor. Democrats ignore (or spit in the face of) their working class, not-white-male base at their own peril (and all of ours, as the results of years of unpopular "safe" centrist Democratic candidates is fascism). Reduced turnout vs 2020 due to failure to sufficiently counter racist voter suppression and refusal to go against Israel and techbros hurt Harris more than a few suburbanites who supposedly voted based of fear of coed toilets.
@PedestrianError @mastodonmigration I do agree that voter turnout is crucial, and ultimately unpredictable.
@lauren @mastodonmigration Variable and unpredictable aren't the same thing. Running to the center with wishy washy platforms that don't promise meaningful change suppresses turnout, as does fighting/supporting unpopular wars and implementing policies while in office that make the rich richer and the poor poorer while telling the working class their underemployment and housing instability are a "vibecession" because the stock market is rising. None of that was a mystery.