Governments should subsidize heat pumps (and solar/wind) and require them in building codes, including a requirement that they can be fully used for heating and for cooling; as well as expedite phasing out other means of heating.

This is a public health and safety issue.

@thomasfuchs we know, but there are billions in bribes for prioritising oil & gas
@ehproque yes, also a corruption and national security issue
@thomasfuchs yeah, imagine being able to NGAF what Iran, the Saudis or Putin do with their fossils

@thomasfuchs I agree, and Biden's IRA did do this, however in such a way that tended to benefit HVAC installation companies much more than than homeowners. So how the subsidy is done matters quite a bit. Especially where private equity has such a tendency to swoop in an capture the subsidy benefit like has happened with solar and hvac industries in the USA

Also a USA problem, modern R-290 monobloc heatpumps need to be made legal / available for residential installation

@thomasfuchs subsidies are surprisingly difficult to do right. I think more helpful would be to just buy a struggling company in the sector and ramp up production of units to flood the market.

I think the same should happen with housing.

There isn't a need to innovate so much here, just to scale up... and boy can governments do scale.

@thomasfuchs If they really want to bring the price down, pick a reasonably good design, buy it, and release the entire manufacturing process royalty free.
@thomasfuchs well yes, but then they're Heizungsstasi