🏷️ AI content is getting labels.

Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.

From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
🔹 Deepfakes
🔹 AI-generated or manipulated content
🔹 Interactions with chatbots and AI systems

You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI 🤖

👉 https://link.europa.eu/jrcdgq

@EUCommission how is this enforced?
@jansteen @EUCommission From the link: "Today, the European Commission published the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling of AI-generated content. The Code is voluntary and" will therefore not be enforced.
Continuing to read: "The Code is voluntary and … to help … systems meet the AI Act transparency obligations that will apply from 2 August 2026. From that date, the AI Act will require clear labelling." It's voluntary until August, at which point it becomes obligatory.

I was skeptical until I read the post, but it might actually work. The obligation is on publishers to mark their content: news papers that use LLMs to generate articles, companies that put up a support chat-bot, … If they don't, they can be convicted according to the law.

There's a gap for shit-flingers on Twitter, whether funded by enemies in the US or Russia, but any law setting out to regulate around that will fail.

As I read it, this is meant to force European companies to disclose if they outsourced customer service to Johnny 5 or writing newspapers to Tom Servo. And that's a genuinely good and meaningful step, IMO. From just the post, it's not entirely clear how (if) it will apply to SoMe.