I just realised that for the base of the word it didn't use my misspelling ‘kilogramme' nor its corrected spelling ‘kilograms’. Even if you drop the two t's, it's kilograme. <insert exasperated facepalm here>

@billgoats but there is only one t in the metric spelling of kilogram

@billgoats A self-healing system, at least when you ask how many r's in kilogramme.

@billgoats Given how they work, and that the first step is tokenising the input into numbers, this is an unsurprising result. Kilo-gram might be tokenised to (for example) 24253 72525, and it’s just vectors from then onwards. The letters don’t exist.

@billgoats I do wonder if they can fix this with some built-in tool calls, perhaps taking a page from Wolfram Alpha's approach

@billgoats That's why RAM & storage prices are insane? Oh well...

@billgoats The real question in this is why is someone using Google? 🤔