AUR registration disabled - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

@archlinux well, that sounds good.
@archlinux Thanks! I hope some of the very best tools find a way in the arch repository, because I lost trust in AUR...
@73CC @archlinux
You weren't supposed to fully trust the AUR from the beginning anyways. Anyone can submit and maintain packages

@mocchatek @73CC @archlinux

realistically the problem is only with abandoned packages. compare it with with debian where they're semi-automatically scheduled for removal

@mattesilver @mocchatek @archlinux I understand, but the trust is gone 🤔 luckely, none of my AUR programms were infected.

@73CC

so what do you do instead? "curl | bash"?

@mattesilver Nope, never. Though I was not affected by the AUR hack, I have lost trust in it. I had nothing critical from the AUR that I urgently needed, so I removed all AUR packages. Currently, I only use what is available in the official Arch repositories.

If I ever need something from the AUR, I will download the PKGBUILD manually, review it, makepkg --verifysource, and build it with makepkg.

@73CC
@mattesilver

> I have lost trust in it [...]

The AUR shouldn't be (blindly) trusted anyway, so good :)

> If I ever need something from the AUR [...]

You're basically describing the normal / expected and officially documented way to install packages from the AUR (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Installing_and_upgrading_packages). AUR helpers (or any other way to interact with the AUR) always have been discouraged and unsupported.

Arch User Repository - ArchWiki

@Antiz @73CC @mattesilver there is room for healthy aur helpers, but they pretty much help by making users do their due diligence easier. in any case, yes, verify that shit
@73CC @mattesilver @mocchatek @archlinux you were never supposed to "trust" the aur, that's the point
@mattesilver @mocchatek @73CC @archlinux no realistically that is not the only problem lol
@archlinux Thank you for all your hard work
@archlinux thanks for all the work!