so if AI is so amazing, why don’t articles and books written with it have huge “proudly made with AI” banners and stickers on it
we all know why
so if AI is so amazing, why don’t articles and books written with it have huge “proudly made with AI” banners and stickers on it
we all know why
@renetron @thomasfuchs A mouse will truly learn *without 3rd party input* to respond to situations, like if the cheese in the middle of the dungeon that their mouse friend ate kills the friend, they'll avoid it.
LLM is not intelligence, it is a statistical generator with a huge amount of exceptions (not like synapses). I don't think the mouse and an LLM equate in the least.
@renetron @thomasfuchs 1/2 As I understand it, an exception (parameter) is a rule describing how to act in case a certain situation comes up.
I was referring to the use of the word synapse by you, @renetron
"... trillion parameters. A little more than the number of synapses of a mouse."
A synapse is something both much more specific than an exception (parameter), flexible but also more general. I don't know enough to say if using "synapse" in this context is correct.
@renetron @thomasfuchs 2/2
What I was trying to get at is that LLM parameters are not an indication of intelligence / sound learning decisions.
Not directly relevant, just trying to figure out synapses and intelligence:
This paper
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4685590/
states that equating the number of synapses with intelligence is debated. EDIT: clarified, added original publisher link to study