so if AI is so amazing, why don’t articles and books written with it have huge “proudly made with AI” banners and stickers on it

we all know why

@thomasfuchs the largest LLM has something like a trillion parameters. A little more than the number of synapses of a mouse. So I guess you can think of an LLM as an extremely learned mouse that is trained to appease

@renetron @thomasfuchs A mouse will truly learn *without 3rd party input* to respond to situations, like if the cheese in the middle of the dungeon that their mouse friend ate kills the friend, they'll avoid it.

LLM is not intelligence, it is a statistical generator with a huge amount of exceptions (not like synapses). I don't think the mouse and an LLM equate in the least.

@cohentheblue @thomasfuchs cohen what do you mean by “huge number of exceptions (not like synapses)”?

@renetron @thomasfuchs 1/2 As I understand it, an exception (parameter) is a rule describing how to act in case a certain situation comes up.

I was referring to the use of the word synapse by you, @renetron
"... trillion parameters. A little more than the number of synapses of a mouse."

A synapse is something both much more specific than an exception (parameter), flexible but also more general. I don't know enough to say if using "synapse" in this context is correct.

@renetron @thomasfuchs 2/2
What I was trying to get at is that LLM parameters are not an indication of intelligence / sound learning decisions.

Not directly relevant, just trying to figure out synapses and intelligence:

This paper

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article/371/1685/20150180/22710/Neuronal-factors-determining-high

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4685590/

states that equating the number of synapses with intelligence is debated. EDIT: clarified, added original publisher link to study

@cohentheblue @renetron generally you cannot compare brains with computers because they work fundamentally differently (the most fundamental one is that a brain doesn’t run software but is a physical object subject to, well, physics; and doesn’t “compute” things, there’s no conversion of symbols happening)