They can strip back protections like that, making it a moot point.
yet more reasons to plant native plants!
@stragu My dread is that this will be used as an excuse to remove protections, not stop data centres.
NEVER underestimate the ability of the rich to be evil.
@stragu You think Big Tech's gonna care? They got the money to pay off the fines if they develop there anyways. Money is why Big Autos can skirt pollution laws and get off with a slap on the wrist while if small tuning shops try it, they're fined out of business (Christ, our legal system ain't fair in the slightest). What's stopping the same logic from being used by Big Tech?
Plus, Big Tech can just pay to get protections removed or weakened as others on this thread have said.
Shit, you know how speech opposing AI datacenters is protected by the First Amendment? Big Tech could pay to get those protections weakened or stripped too.

@stragu as, in the UK special protected status is given to village greens, campaigners will look to block development by having an area of land declare a village green.
Also bats, don't go mithering bats. That has significant penalties associated with it.
@stragu It's a good idea, but people will have to prepare for the likely counterattack in which data centers get waivers or they just outright ignore the law.
But there's also a very good chance that the "AI" bubble bursts first and then you've helped endangered plants.