that fucking post popped up on my feed again and it’s incredible the bad faith of going “let me get this straight” and then acting like the negative feedback on rsync turning into slop started when someone noticed Claude commits and not when someone lost backups because rsync is broken due to all the Claude commits

that fucking post got boosted onto my feed *again* and I guess this time all I want to say is that any asshole can claim to be anti-LLM while shouting down and tone policing legitimate critiques of LLMs. that is in fact a common sales tactic used by boosters: Simon Willison has declared himself an AI critic, but in every way that matters he defends the technology and boosts critihype.

it sucks but sometimes even marginalized people get taken in by a harmful power structure and end up saying and doing terrible things to defend their position in that power structure.

I’ve watched far too many of my personal heroes fall prey to cognitive surrender to be shocked anymore when it happens, but I understand the urge to side with someone you used to look to as a positive example. please do what you can to prevent yourself from being used as part of a harmful power structure, even if someone from your same lot in life tells you that this time the power structure is ok.

@zzt Willison drives me nuts for that, his whole deal is laundering the most extreme booster arguments through a veneer of legitimacy. And yeah, agreed, tridge's post is absolutely of a kind with that strategy.
@xgranade @zzt there is a guaranteed spot in Dante's Programmer Hell for Willison, maybe in satan's third mouth

@xgranade Tridge's entire post can be summarized down to how he thinks that everything people know about writing software is now obsolete and whatever they learned might as well have been from another planet.

It has no veneer of legitimacy.

@zzt