When you're preparing a PR, after you've run all the tests and linted and benchmarked and polished and so on, do you do a `git diff` and take a visual scan through all the changes?
Always
63.4%
Usually
29.4%
Frequently not
7.2%
Poll ended at .
@timbray
I also virtually always do `git diff --staged` before even a local commit. I should say I'm an old man and work from the command line with an editor and git porcelain commands rather than an IDE or fancier git tooling like lazygit, so make of my vote what you will.

I think you'd appreciate #Magit @jbowen

https://magit.vc/

It's Magit! A Git Porcelain inside Emacs

Support Magit Development

@bignose
I appreciate the suggestion, genuinely, but I'm a die-hard ed(1)/ex(1)/vi(1)/vim(1) user. I generally have a few editor sessions going with tmux(1) and git(1) in its own pane, so I somewhat approximate an IDE with separate tools.
My IDE is the terminal window, so “tmux(1) is my IDE” makes perfect sense to me, @jbowen