Conflicted. On one hand I'm happy that Trump doesn't just get to rename shit after himself because he's fucking American Borat.

Otoh, it's pretty disturbing that a fucking building has better legal protections than I dunno, women, like all of them, in America?

I endorse "bricks"

@AnarchoNinaWrites

I endorse the United Front (which is in practice the coalition of socialist parties and anarchist organizations in the US, which are led by the DSA)

@AnarchoNinaWrites @lisamelton Amen!

But…I suppose we’re going to have to wait until the Supreme Court weighs in. <sigh>

@bubbajet @lisamelton I mean the problem there is that the law is SUPER CLEAR on what the name is, and where the name goes (building, stationary, etc) that there more or less is no grounds to rule for him.

Now, will that stop Roberts? I dunno. But he is obviously concerned with a legitimacy crisis for SCOTUS or he wouldn't be scolding us for calling SCOTUS illegitimate once every 4 months. Is this the hill Roberts is ready to write new law on? I doubt it.