I’ve written what I hope is both a lay-friendly and roughly accurate explanation of the big 1920s debate¹ between (especially) Einstein and Bohr about causality in quantum mechanics. Possibly because I’m a failed physics major, I’d be more bothered than usual if I got things wrong.

So if you have technical or historical knowledge, I’d love for you to give me corrections for https://blog.oddly-influenced.dev/binary/ before it goes live. Thanks.

¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr%E2%80%93Einstein_debates

#physics #ScienceHistory

binary

What’s up with quantum mechanics? (36 Views of Mount CritRat) ⊕ Split this off from the real final post so that it’s more easily skippable. Use perseveration as a somewhat rude analogy? I mean, we all do it. About this series

@marick Your description is mostly correct. A missing point is that measurement requires interaction and thus *changes* the quantum state. If you measure the momentum of a particle, it has a new quantum state after the measurement, and in that state, position is undefined. It's not just impossible to measure position and momentum at the same time. There is no possible quantum state in which position and momentum have well-defined values. That's what Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is about.
@khinsen Thanks. I’ve updated.