@jeffowski said by a guy who is still posting to the world's largest child pornography website o. The planet.

He's right, but it hits less.

@log you might be missing the point. Posting at all on a child porn site is a problem.
@fiend_unpleasant Network effects are brutal for those in the communications field. Ultimately, those people have to meet the audience where they live, even when their neighborhood transforms into a degenerate sea of iniquity around them and they refuse to move. Posting abuse material is a problem. Posting political commentary is not, whether it be in virtueville or sintown. People *should* GTFO the former Twitter. I won't kick the ones who still feel like they have business there.
@log there is no reason to be on a child pornography site. Unless you enjoy child porn, being on a child porn site makes no sense.
@fiend_unpleasant I'm not certain that everyone would characterize X as "a child porn site". You can if you want. I would be more apt to call it a Nazi bar. One might enter, so as to alert non-fascist customers that the owner is a Nazi, and point out all the iconography and dog whistles, and try to convince them to visit another establishment, but it isn't an offense against me to be there. I have freed my mind from X. I don't go there, and I don't think about anyone who does.
@log the site itself allowed people to make child pornography. The users of the site created child pornography. How else should it be described?

@fiend_unpleasant As a pandegenerate site catering to all manner of humanity's dark impulses. It is *also* a fascist propaganda site, a disinformation campaign site, an ego-driven billionaire vanity site, a fallen social media site, a pump-and-dump scam site, an adult pornography site, a pointless waste of everyone's time....

And for some people, it is still Twitter, and their circle of follows and mutuals is not yet all monsters. I hope they get out okay.

@log So you are not willing to say that a site that has a feature that lets/has let its users to create and disseminate child pornography is not a child pornography site, and thus it's users are not on a child pornography site?

Is this because you are in favor of the practice or because you are so morally corrupt that you are willing to excuse the practice?

@fiend_unpleasant No. I am not. And your false binary does not encompass the entire range of reasoning for that. It is because a shopping mall that is 0.1% hot dog restaurant is not a wiener stand.

If you keep up this line of argumentation, which is essentially dishonest and carries a tone of browbeating rather than open engagement, I will block you.

@log please feel free. I have no idea who you are, or why you chose to defend the asinine position you took.

Your defense is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your pedo-apologist rambling were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

@fiend_unpleasant You must have the statistics on this. What fraction of X.com site traffic could be considered CSAM or illustrations evocative of it? Since any arbitrary date, or within any arbitrary time window.

You live on planet Earth. That's a child porn planet. Why do you live on a child porn planet? Why do you live in a child porn star system? Why don't you live on a Trappist-1 planet, where there is no CSAM traffic?

@fiend_unpleasant You are my epistemologic inferior. You cannot see the world in color, but as entirely dark or entirely light. One drop of ink taints your entire vat of milk. You cannot speak in terms of fractions or percentages, or parts per million, but only as IS and IS NOT. As such, you are not qualified to speak with the mature minds. I shall therefore speak to you as such.

Shut the fuck up until you mature more. Every conversation has a person on the other end. Don't be an asshole.

@log You are not a person... you are a log. One that has decided to "reply guy" with a pedo-apologist take on a website that creates tools with features specifically designed to "digitally rape" people that also had no safe guards to keep people from using it against children. This is something I absolutely see as black and white. I will not apologize for my stance nor my convictions.

If you were offended... so what. Stop having dogshit takes.