@randulo @zzt
No, I don't think AI would be cool then, there are still so many issues that isn't helped by the averageing out-o-meter, I'd much rather read something where I see someone tried, broken norwegian that I can puzzle out because I see what the person tried to do I'm okay with puzzling out and some times help someone get better if they want to, but someone just putting something into the "good enough for me" box and just leaving me hanging don't deserve to get any cookies for trying, I'd much rather have to puzzle out the meaning of a french sentence, and believe me I utterly suck at french than having to read it machine translated, at least if there is something wrong in how I did it it's a learning moment, and I can get better at something, even though it's not something I was really prepared to get better at that day.
Of course the anglos aren't really going to care, because they are never going to have to use the result, don't have to suffer from not having the neuances there, aren't going to notice the context that is going missing. There are whole conversations that I have had that I've put to a translator for fun and 70% of what is going through it makes no sense any more, and that's not something that is going to be solved by "I'm not sure but" almost all LLM chatbots has the "Always check the result, never use the result without verifying" thing under it, and we all know how much people pay attention to that.