(I've risen mornings with this unshakable notion, and it must out)
The Conundrum (or why entangled information exchange seems convoluted—or the missing elegance in QM, and the riddle of dark matter/energy).
Genesis’ “In the beginning there was the word” fits.
No dimensionality is possible without info first; it presents as the first actual spacial dimension, but is immeasurable in the absence of another point, and in that phase encompasses all of what is the totality of physical space/time.
As such, information itself presents as the first dimension or as ‘pre-dimension’ as information precedes any physical dimension.
Information is always linear: it must be, as no two points can occupy the same space/moment without being part of the same space/moment. Entangled.
As any two physical points must be separate in that initial dimensionality, it then presents as a sort of force.
Every action and reaction, and even life itself, creates a ‘sequential exchange’ in higher dimensions, but one essential linearity forms along with it: time.
Accordingly, space/time is a then product of information.
This ‘sequential exchange’, too, is a quantum, and must have a mass, of sorts — as Information is self attractive: DNA, for instance, or even simply crystalline forms, present then as a density of quasi-mass and quasi-force.
In that case, life creation, or any information copy and re-expression, and subsequent propagation may present as density.
The proof may be the difference between singularity (pre-Bang) and the dispersion of dark matter as it now exists.
This should be measurable – and may have already been. Dark matter density may reflect, in fact, the distribution of life and other complex information entanglement in the universe.
All that together may say this oddball thing:
the #infoton — an immeasurably small (quasi- (quasi-ness is of course of no consequence on this level)) particle, whose mass might be on the comparative order of that of a neutrino compared to a photon.
Imagine that similar relative scale then of an infoton to a neutrino.
And, if all this wildness were true, where would it leave the standard model?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintessence_(physics)
Since my arrival at the notion was independent from all this lovely math, as philosophy, subsequent poking around has revealed earlier visitors to the notion -- though not arrived at via quantum mechanical aspects as they art out in space/time, I feel a bit reassured.
https://phys.org/news/2026-05-dark-energy-equation-mathematicians-standard.html
(recent, and posted free of further comment concerning the above from me)
"Both the Lambda-cold dark matter model and a spherically symmetric spacetime produce a special place where we must lie for the model to be physically plausible," Temple said. "If this principle rules out one, it has to rule out the other."
Mathematicians are challenging the idea that dark energy is responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe. In a new paper published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, mathematicians from the University of California, Davis, provide mathematical proof that instabilities inherent in the Einstein-Euler equations imply that the current model of the expanding universe is not viable.
hewiak