A parting shot (until I resume chattering away on the bus or the train): as someone with a scientific education (in part) I am of course infuriated by right-wing #Christian pretensions to be the true guardians of science and the intellectual traditions of "the West". They've been attempting to build that impression of themselves ever since #CSLewis taught Christians how to pretend as if their Christian faith was the product of reasoned decision, and it's quite false and insidious and I hate it. But they have embraced this position out of scientism, the fallacious employment of science or concepts from science as if they were moral precepts or articles of religious faith. The Christofascısts wish to pretend that all of their beliefs, especially the most hideously bıgoted of those beliefs, are backed up by empirical science.

But still more infuriating and bewildering is the game that these right-wing Christians play with freedom and the concept of human rights. Even more flagrantly than with science, extremist Christians assert themselves to be the sole protectors of human freedom and even of democracy, and somehow they can do this with a straight face even though both their religion and their politics (which merge with one another) are nakedly authoritarian. They really do not seem able to grasp the self-contradiction. To this day, Christofascısts refuse to treat with the notion that they're authoritarians. Challenge them on the subject and they'll either run away or start screaming nonsense about Muslims or leftists by way of deflection. They stick hard to the pretence that they're the sole custodians of all the noble values of "the West", not just liberty but all ethics, all morality. They say none of these would exist but for the Christian faith.

I am not entirely sure how they can keep up this pretence, but they do—they are sensationally good at this game, so good at it that the Republican fascisti have the mainline #Democrats completely befuddled and cowed (or bought or blackmailed, perhaps) and in awe of the Republicans' ostensibly supreme commitment to rights and principles.

The GOP has learned that if they bray loudly enough in unison about the morals they clearly don't possess and the rights they openly wish to be suppressed, almost the whole Democratic establishment will believe them, and thus go on believing that the Republicans are people who can be trusted to uphold a bargain. To reinforce the pretence, the GOP assigns a couple of their "moderates" to spend their entire careers in a show of elaborate waffling about sacred principles (e.g. Olympia Snowe).

The Democrats as a body never seem to notice or care that these Republican "moderates" always side with the fascist majority after their waffling, but the Democrats as a body refuse to acknowledge that their Republican opponents are in fact a fascist party, and I would hazard to guess that top Democratic lawmakers feel bound by secret agreements with ostensibly "moderate" Republicans to prevent descriptive words as "fascist" or "racist" from sticking to ANY U.S. representative.

The GOP pseudo-moderates must be promising in turn that Trumpism is a temporary inflammation and if the Democrats would only be lenient and forgiving enough (invoking the sacrosanct American principle of compromise, which the Republicans also routinely traduce) then the inflammation will pass and the GOP will once more be the fiscal conscience of the nation or whatever.

But why do Democrats fall for GOP lies?

Christianity is the answer to that question! Christians of a very particularly zealous and hyperpolitical sort took over the GOP for good as part of the Reaganite fascist counterrevolution, the first open eruption of Christofascist national government in the United States.

Reagan did not, as later waves of more extreme GOP politicians would eventually do, openly proclaim that his job was upholding Christian values. But his most visible allies were reactionary Christian fanatics such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, and the tenor of his Presidency was relentlessly moralistic and borrowed heavily from the rhetoric of right-wing Christian preaching and media-savvy "televangelism".

Ever since the Republican Party has advertised itself, somewhat sneakily at first but with ever-increasing loudness and fervour, as the party of #faith. "We are the people who actually believe in things," is the Republican cry, "not like those hypocritical poll-driven Democrats."

And you know what? They're not wrong.

This is a lesson that Democrats and their partisans are loath to learn about themselves: the Republicans have the party leadership clocked. The Democrats, as a whole, adhere to no sound principles whatever. The Democrats freely imitate the methods and rhetoric of their fascist opponents and indeed the Party seems generally to wish it were more like the GOP: more centralized, more authoritarian, better able to whip its voters into loyalty behind a single person, and more "working class" according to the racist and cartoonish idea of "working class" put forth in GOP dogma and embraced by mainstream U.S. politics and media.

As a result of the Democratic longing to mimic the ways of the GOP, the Democratic Party has betrayed every principle they have ever pretended to uphold in the name of preserving a "big tent" and an open-door policy towards conservatives, while heaping vitriol and contempt upon social democrats and leftists for being "divisive" and concerned with "purity tests" for having the cheek to attempt holding the Party to its supposed values.

@mxchara

The Democrats impeached Trump TWICE, the American people elected him TWICE, the Democratic party is not the problem here.

@HakeemG sure they are! they are responsible for their own electoral defeats. if they really do think that the people generally are too stupid and corrupt to vote for them then why are they even still in politics, other than to reap the advantages of being second banana to the GOP fascists? The fascists offer the Democrats a cosmetic share of power—and that really does seem to be enough for some Democratic politicians, anyway.

@mxchara

If I go to a job interview, nail the interview, and the company hires some bumbling idiot, you think that's my fault? I think the company shit the bed and is about to get everything they deserve.

@HakeemG the analogy makes no sense: the population of the United States is not a business and in a democracy, they get to reject anyone they like and it's the politicians' responsibility to be appealing to the people.

@mxchara

Even MAGA voters have figured it out, maybe one day you will catch up to them.

“Apparently I’m an idiot.” Woman at Pennsylvania gas station who voted for Trump rips into him, calls him “a worthless pile of sh*t”.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-voter-went-viral-cursing-163225154.html

A Trump Voter Went Viral for Cursing Out the President Over Gas Prices. The Real Story Is the 3 Voters at the Same Pump Who Didn't

A clip of a Pennsylvania woman cursing out President Trump at a gas station has been tearing across social media this week — and for ... Read More

Yahoo News
@HakeemG I'm not sure why you're insulting me; I have reliably voted Democratic myself, every election. And it's still on the Democrats' heads for losing. That's democracy for you!

@mxchara

I'm not insulting you, I'm telling the truth, if that offends you that's fine. The American people fumbled the bag, you're defending the absurd. The Democrats are not responsible for your decisions or those of anyone else, these people wanted a fascist Nazi dictator, they got one.

@HakeemG and...now what? you've condemned the American people. perhaps they deserve the condemnation; I am not arguing that.

But what do you propose to do about it?

@mxchara

I have no idea. Not my problem to fix. I can tell you that in order to fix a problem you have to correctly identify it.